AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Whitepages · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Whitepages

4Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Whitepages was named 2 times in Background screening, where Checkr led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In background screening · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Whitepages for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Background screeningTalent acquisition0%78 of 83100%2under 10 labels · led by Checkr at 31%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Whitepages held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Background screening · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 of 52, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 45 → 65 of 70
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 41 → 53 of 62

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Background screening0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 45 → 78 of 83

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Whitepages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you cannot afford unlicensed "cheap" sites (like free Whitepages lookups) because using them carries massive legal liability” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Background screening · budget prompt · hard negative
“Sites like TruthFinder, Instant Checkmate, BeenVerified, Spokeo, and Whitepages” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Background screening · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Whitepages, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whitepages was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HireRight4 of 40Not among the top eight
Sterling4 of 40Not among the top eight
BeenVerified3 of 40Not among the top eight
Instant Checkmate3 of 40Not among the top eight
Spokeo3 of 40Not among the top eight
TruthFinder3 of 40Not among the top eight
Checkr2 of 41Not among the top eight
Checkster1 of 41Not among the top eight
GoodHire1 of 41Not among the top eight
AppFolio1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Whitepages. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Whitepages and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on whitepages.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
62
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog45undated
Conference or event12undated
Case study422026-08-13
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page whitepages.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Whitepages

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Whitepages is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the trusted source for contact info & property data
For
consumers and businesses
Price stated
Free to search. Whitepages Premium adds cell phone numbers, background reports, and property ownership records through a subscription. Enjoy a 14-day risk-free trial with no credit card required — cancel anytime. whitepages.com
Free plan or trial
Free to search whitepages.com
Customers named
WISBEInfinium RealtyRetire ProtectedArkcess Care
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Whitepages's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: whitepages.com, whitepages.com/pro-api/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Whitepages's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Whitepages, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Whitepages by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Whitepages is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Whitepages, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at whitepages.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.