Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 of 74, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedValamis
14Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Valamis was named 5 times in Learning experience plat and 1 other category, where 360Learning led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business53 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 89
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 62
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Valamis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 28 of 89 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 50 of 92 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Valamis held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 49 → 40 of 84
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 → 48 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 28 of 89 |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 69 → 50 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Valamis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Valamis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Valamis \u2014 best if compliance + authoring + reporting matter more.” GPT-5.4 mini · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Valamis, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Valamis was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Valamis, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Valamis was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Valamis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Valamis and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
valamis.comYour site10
goskills.com5
companylms.com4
computerworld.com4
degreed.com4
docebo.com4
firsthr.app4
guideflow.com4
ispring.com4
konstantly.com4
Thirty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Valamis came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on valamis.com
674
subdomains included
Content
199
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
14 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 77 | 5 | 2026-09-22 | Compliance training | |
| News or press | 77 | 3 | 2026-09-16 | Learning experience plat | |
| Case study | 25 | 0 | 2026-01-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-13 | Learning experience plat | |
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2024-08-12 | Compliance training, Employee onboarding | |
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Training needs analysis blog
- 2026-09-16Statens vegvesen news or press
- 2026-09-08Brain brew reseller partnership news or press
- 2026-09-03Best lms corporate training blog
- 2026-07-28Ai talent management blog
- 2026-07-23Ai readiness gap blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page valamis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Valamis
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Valamis is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Valamis is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The enterprise LMS that goes beyond completion tracking.
- For
- L&D teams
- Free plan or trial
- free trial or demo valamis.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 500 valamis.com · 250 valamis.com/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- ISO 27001ISO 27017ISAE 3000 type IIAvailable on G-CloudGDPRISO-certified securityG-CloudCore Challenger 2026 Fosway 9-Grid™ for Learning Systems
- Customers named
- JägermeisterXP Inc.VaillantEnento GroupNational government agencyVaillant GroupFastemsLambda Chi Alpha
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What Valamis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: valamis.com, valamis.com/pricing, valamis.com/security, valamis.com/platform/overview, valamis.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Valamis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Valamis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Valamis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Valamis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Valamis, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.