Every category where a model named EdCast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	16 of 89	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	39 of 61	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	51 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	73 of 127	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, EdCast held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 → 56 of 74

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 → 19 of 84

Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

7%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 21 → 6 of 58

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Learning experience plat	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 25 → 16 of 89
Learning management syst	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 39 of 61, unchanged
Online course libraries	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 51 of 95, unchanged
Skills intelligence	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 73 of 127, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated EdCast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	3	0	4
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for companies deeply embedded in the Cornerstone ecosystem who need unified talent management.” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · alternative

“The Best for Skill Mapping & Personalization: EdCast” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“*Best for Corporate-Scale Talent Ecosystems*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Strong Cautions — Major Red Flags ... clunky backend, steep admin learning curve, and uninspiring learner UI” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EdCast, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EdCast was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Degreed19 of 266Not among the top eight

Docebo19 of 263Not among the top eight

360Learning15 of 262Not among the top eight

Absorb LMS10 of 261Not among the top eight

Cornerstone OnDemand10 of 260Not among the top eight

LinkedIn Learning8 of 261Not among the top eight

GoSkills5 of 261Not among the top eight

Udemy Business5 of 261Not among the top eight

Skillsoft Percipio5 of 260Not among the top eight

TalentLMS5 of 260Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EdCast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 26 answers that named EdCast and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com14

g2.com12

guideflow.com11

firsthr.app7

techtarget.com7

ispring.com6

absorbai.com5

careervira.com5

cornerstoneondemand.com5

digitalhumans.com5

No domain is on file for EdCast, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms14

guideflow.com/blog/learning-experience-platform11

firsthr.app/compare/training/lxp-learning-platform6

g2.com/categories/learning-experience-platforms-lxp6

ispring.com/knowledge-hub/learning-experience-platforms6

techtarget.com/enterprise-software/tip/10-top-learning-experience-platforms-to-use-in-20266

digitalhumans.com/blog/the-10-best-learning-experience-platforms-lxp-reviewed-for-20265

absorbai.com/blog/best-learning-experience-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where EdCast stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“edcast”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 89 in learning experience plat

Segment leader

26%

360Learning

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as EdCast

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EdCast; a claim can dispute any of them.

EdCast by Cornerstone 2Cornerstone OnDemand / EdCast 1EdCast (by Cornerstone) 1

Follow EdCast

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EdCast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EdCast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EdCast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where EdCast is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name EdCast, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.