Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 9 of 99
2 categories · RankedTeamOhana
40Judge labels
6First choices
6Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Workforce planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of TeamOhana →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 102
2%11 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market5 of 98
5%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 83
4%7 labels
under the label threshold
In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TeamOhana for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 5% | 5 of 98 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 21 of 95 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TeamOhana held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 → 12 of 93
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 7 of 68
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 5 of 98 |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 21 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TeamOhana across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TeamOhana across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase17 labels3
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd start with TeamOhana. It's purpose-built to connect Finance, HR, and Talent around a shared hiring plan” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce planning · direct prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: TeamOhana” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce planning · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“## Top Recommendation: TeamOhana” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce planning · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If Collaborative & Headcount Lifecycle Focused ... Tools like TeamOhana or Rippling’s Headcount Planning module.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TeamOhana, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TeamOhana was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TeamOhana, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TeamOhana was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TeamOhana. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named TeamOhana and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
teamohana.comYour site24
charthop.com18
guideflow.com17
resources.rework.com17
peoplemanagingpeople.com15
firsthr.app14
intervue.io12
abacum.ai10
hrtechsaas.com10
checkthat.ai8
121 of the 145 domain citations in answers naming TeamOhana came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
teamohana.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TeamOhana takes 5% of first choices and ChartHop takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
teamohana.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TeamOhana takes 5% of first choices and ChartHop takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workforce planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“teamohana”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 470 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 154 · 7 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 616
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 5 of 98 in workforce planning
Segment leader
37%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 40 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on teamohana.com
222
subdomains included
Content
144
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
15 · 14
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 59 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | Workforce planning, Org charts | |
| Podcast or video | 41 | 11 | 2026-09-17 | Workforce planning | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 3 | 2026-09-11 | Workforce planning | |
| Case study | 14 | 4 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28From token spend to ai spend management and control blog
- 2026-09-17From headcount tracking to strategic workforce planning podcast or video
- 2026-09-17From reconciliation to real time decisions podcast or video
- 2026-09-17One source of truth podcast or video
- 2026-09-11The new workforce planning for humans digital coworkers webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-10Scenario planning for cfos blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teamohana.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow TeamOhana
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TeamOhana is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TeamOhana is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Headcount Management Platform
- For
- Finance, Talent, and HR leaders
- Price stated
- Free is $0/year forever for companies up to 150 employees, plus a $5,000 one-time setup to connect your systems. Professional starts at $15,000/year for 151 to 500 employees, plus $5,000 setup. Growth starts at $45,000/year for 501 to 1,500 employees, and Enterprise starts at $95,000/year for 1,500+ employees; both include white-glove implementation. Every plan gives your whole team access, so you are never charged per seat. Book a demo for a quote based on your headcount. teamohana.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 teamohana.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free is $0/year forever for companies up to 150 employees, plus a $5,000 one-time setup to connect your systems. teamohana.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001SOC 2
- Hosting
- United States of America
- Customers named
- GreenhouseBluevineSeatGeekScaleDockerPostmanVercelDandy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What TeamOhana's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: teamohana.com, teamohana.com, teamohana.com/pricing, trust.teamohana.com, teamohana.com/solutions/talent. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TeamOhana's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TeamOhana, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TeamOhana by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TeamOhana is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TeamOhana, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.