AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Teamed · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Teamed

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Teamed was named 1 time in Global payroll, where Deel led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Teamed for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Global payroll and employer of recordCore HR and payroll0%48 of 610%1under 10 labels · led by Deel at 30%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Teamed held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Global payroll · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 25 of 48
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 42 of 53
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 28 → 36 of 45

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Global payroll2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 48 of 61

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Teamed across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teamed, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamed was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deel4 of 41Not among the top eight
Remote4 of 40Not among the top eight
G-P3 of 40Not among the top eight
Papaya Global3 of 40Not among the top eight
Multiplier2 of 42Not among the top eight
Rippling2 of 40Not among the top eight
Oyster1 of 41Not among the top eight
Atlas HXM1 of 40Not among the top eight
Gloroots1 of 40Not among the top eight
G‑P1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teamed. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Teamed and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

teamed.globalYour site4
alcor.com3
atlashxm.com2
deel.com2
eco.com2
gartner.com2
globaleorservices.org2
gloroots.com2
hr.software2
oysterhr.com2

Nineteen of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Teamed came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on teamed.global
2,572
subdomains included
Content
1,146
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 19
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Comparison440352026-08-16
Blog37832026-09-16
Glossary or explainer171702026-09-04
Template or tool15002026-05-20
Case study702026-05-14

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page teamed.global exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Teamed

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Teamed is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Employer of Record for teams with global aspirations
For
teams with global aspirations
Price stated
Contractor Management FROM $49/ contractor / month; Employer of Record $599/ employee / month; Global Entity & Employment Operations CUSTOM Quote/ entity / project teamed.global
Starting price
49 teamed.global
Free plan or trial
free contractor classification checker teamed.global/teamed-opinion/platform-work-directive-contractors
Hosting
187+ countries
Customers named
AnthropicKlarnaNotionEventbriteWiseBioNTechGlobantPersonio
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications

What Teamed's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: teamed.global, teamed.global/pricing, teamed.global/teamed-opinion/platform-work-directive-contractors, teamed.global/case-studies, teamed.global/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamed's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamed, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teamed by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Teamed is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teamed, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teamed.global is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.