Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 54 → 42 of 50
2 categories · Named, not rankedSaba
8Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Saba was named 2 times in Learning management syst and 1 other category, where TalentLMS led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business43 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market53 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise50 of 72
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Saba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 53 of 61 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 90 of 93 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Saba held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 70 → 45 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 41 → 40 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 70 → 53 of 61 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 93, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Saba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Saba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Saba (for Succession Planning) - Why avoid:” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Succession planning · negative prompt · hard negative
“The Enterprise "Bloat" Platforms (e.g., Cornerstone OnDemand, Saba)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Saba, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Saba was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Saba, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Saba was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Saba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Saba and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
docebo.com4
worldmetrics.org4
absorbai.com3
checkthat.ai3
firsthr.app3
g2.com3
goskills.com3
ispring.com3
linkedin.com3
d2l.com2
Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Saba came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cornerstoneondemand.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Saba takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cornerstoneondemand.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Saba takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lms for employee training”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 33,785 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,315 · 511 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,883
- Paid Google search
- 6 searches its ads show for, about 64 clicks and $428 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cornerstoneondemand.com
7,034
subdomains included
Content
3,232
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
96 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,468 | undated | Performance management, Learning experience plat | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 299 | undated | People analytics, Performance management | ||
| News or press | 283 | undated | Learning management syst, Skills intelligence | ||
| Case study | 88 | undated | Compliance training, Employee onboarding | ||
| Conference or event | 31 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 28 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 9 | undated | Performance management, Learning experience plat | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | Learning management syst | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cornerstoneondemand.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (29); 21 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Saba
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Saba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Saba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Saba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Saba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Saba, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.