Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 10 of 84
CYPHER · 3 categories · RankedCYPHER Learning
18Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Learning management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 89 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market10 of 89
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 62
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CYPHER Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 2% | 10 of 89 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 0% | 37 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 25 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CYPHER Learning held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 → 26 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 10 of 89 |
| Course authoring tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 82, unchanged |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 25 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CYPHER Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CYPHER Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“GoSkills and Cypher are particularly recommended for companies with limited budgets” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need advanced AI capabilities or complex multi-audience training, consider CYPHER Learning or Docebo” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Combines business training and academic learning in one platform with strong AI capabilities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best if you need strong all-in-one training + authoring: CYPHER Learning” GPT-5.4 mini · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CYPHER Learning, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CYPHER Learning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CYPHER Learning, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CYPHER Learning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CYPHER Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named CYPHER Learning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cypherlearning.comYour site10
talentlms.com10
docebo.com9
goskills.com8
ispring.com8
d2l.com7
forbes.com7
trupeer.ai7
g2.com5
intellum.com5
Sixty-six of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming CYPHER Learning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cypherlearning.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CYPHER Learning takes 2% of first choices and 360Learning takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cypherlearning.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CYPHER Learning takes 2% of first choices and 360Learning takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “learning experience platform”
6
Position for “learning experience platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“cypher learning”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,344 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,311 · 69 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,363
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 89 in learning experience plat
Segment leader
26%
360Learning
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cypherlearning.com
1,246
subdomains included
Content
946
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
39 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 638 | 27 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| News or press | 110 | 7 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 65 | 0 | 2026-04-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 47 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 31 | 0 | 2025-10-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 19 | 0 | 2022-03-31 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-02-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2026-03-02 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Picking the right ai compliance training tools cypher learning blog
- 2026-09-24Ai you can trust why accuracy and transparency matter in learning blog
- 2026-09-24The top ai course platforms cypher learning blog
- 2026-09-22Why learning needs to become living knowledge cypher learning blog
- 2026-09-18Best ai compliance course builders compared in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-17How ai is transforming real estate training and agent development blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cypherlearning.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as CYPHER Learning
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CYPHER Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cypher 1Cypher Learning 1
Follow CYPHER Learning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CYPHER is the company behind CYPHER Learning.ShowHide
The company
CYPHER is the company behind CYPHER Learning.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an AI-native learning platform built to turn training into measurable business performance
- For
- organizations that need to train distributed audiences at scale, including Employees, Partners, Customers, Agents, Dealers, Franchise networks, Member organizations, Contractors, and Training companies
- Price stated
- 0 cypherlearning.com
- Starting price
- 0 cypherlearning.com
- Integrations claimed
- 300 cypherlearning.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 certified
- Customers named
- Bright MLSDaybreak AINTT DATAPoulin Willey AnastopouloMOL Magsaysay Maritime AcademyUnmanned Safety InstituteWest Music Company Inc.Sharjah Education Academy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, hosting
What CYPHER Learning's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cypherlearning.com, cypherlearning.com, cypherlearning.com/pricing, cypherlearning.com/tour/compliance, cypherlearning.com/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CYPHER Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CYPHER Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CYPHER Learning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CYPHER Learning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CYPHER Learning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.