Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 15 of 99
2 categories · Named, not rankedRunn
14Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Runn was named 6 times in Workforce planning and 1 other category, where ChartHop led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 102
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 98
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Runn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 20 of 98 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 53 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Runn held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 32 → 20 of 93
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 20 of 98 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 53 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Runn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Runn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Runn if you are a services-led B2B whose primary constraint is project-based resource allocation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · direct prompt · alternative
“Uniquely focused on project/resource capacity for professional services” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Real-time resource utilization tracking and "What-If" modeling.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Runn (Best for Capacity Forecasting & Financial Planning)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Runn, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Runn was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Runn, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Runn was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Runn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Runn and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
outsourceaccelerator.com8
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
charthop.com5
guideflow.com5
learn.g2.com5
orgvue.com5
rippling.com5
connecteam.com4
gartner.com4
reddit.com4
Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Runn came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
runn.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Runn takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
runn.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Runn takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workforce planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“runn”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 47 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 129,371 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,637 · 494 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,418
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 98 in workforce planning
Segment leader
37%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on runn.io
1,600
subdomains included
Content
794
counted in the table below
Documentation
645
Product · Integration
10 · 20
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 651 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | Workforce planning, Workforce scheduling | |
| Comparison | 44 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 40 | undated | Workforce planning | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 24 | 0 | 2026-01-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 16 | undated | |||
| Case study | 14 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-18 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2023-03-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-02Effective it operations blog
- 2026-05-27Strategic workforce planning blog
- 2026-05-01Overutilization blog
- 2026-05-01Rethinking utilization blog
- 2026-04-24Best resource utilization tools blog
- 2026-04-24Creating a utilization report blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page runn.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Runn
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Runn is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Runn is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Resource management and capacity planning software for teams planning people across technical projects.
- For
- teams planning people across technical projects
- Price stated
- Pricing runn.io
- Starting price
- 7 runn.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start 30-day free trial runn.io
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRSOC2 Type II
- Customers named
- OllionPlanesDenver TechnologyPhitureRocket Science GroupEisnerAmperVeramedAnatta
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Runn's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: runn.io, runn.io/pricing, trust.runn.io, runn.io/features/reporting, runn.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Runn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Runn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Runn by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Runn is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Runn, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.