Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 30 → 40 of 80
7 categories · RankedPymetrics
40Judge labels
0First choices
18Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Candidate assessment for mid-market buyers
Rank 52 of 118 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business45 of 80
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market52 of 118
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise57 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pymetrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 52 of 118 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 69 of 90 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 87 of 90 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 138 of 142 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 109 of 114 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 88 of 97 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 68 of 71 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pymetrics held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 81 → 24 of 115
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 51 of 67
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 81 → 52 of 118 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 69 of 90 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 87 of 90 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 102 → 138 of 142 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 109 of 114, unchanged |
| HR compliance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 88 of 97, unchanged |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 68 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pymetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pymetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Uses games and AI to assess cognitive abilities and work style, good for various roles” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Uses neuroscience-based games and AI to assess candidates beyond just resumes.” MiniMax M2.5 · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best For: Reducing unconscious bias in the early screening stages.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Game-based or neuroscience assessments marketed as predicting job performance without published I/O validation and transparent adverse-impact statistics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · hard negative
“Privacy / data reuse concerns... "This study suggests that candidate results data is saved and ‘used' for 330 days."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · hard negative
“Research found the platform's design "replicated bias instead of erasing it" despite claims of neutrality.” Kimi K2 · HR AI assistants · negative prompt · hard negative
“Research has documented significant issues... the system was found to replicate rather than eliminate bias” MiniMax M2.5 · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pymetrics, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pymetrics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pymetrics, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pymetrics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pymetrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 40 answers that named Pymetrics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com11
peoplemanagingpeople.com10
firsthr.app8
fisherphillips.com7
linkedin.com6
shrm.org6
hiretruffle.com5
hrtechsaas.com5
aitoolbox.hk4
herohunt.ai4
Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Pymetrics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pymetrics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pymetrics takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pymetrics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pymetrics takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“pymetrics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 356 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,117 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 79 · 12 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,725
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Pymetrics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pymetrics; a claim can dispute any of them.
PyMetrics 1Pymetrics (Harver) 1Pymetrics / Harver 1pymetrics 1
Follow Pymetrics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pymetrics is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pymetrics is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unleash your full potential using data
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Pymetrics's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pymetrics.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pymetrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pymetrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pymetrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pymetrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pymetrics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.