Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 80 → 81 of 88
1 category · RankedPeopleFluent Succession Management
25Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Succession planning for enterprise buyers
Rank 32 of 93 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business82 of 91
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market32 of 93
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 82
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PeopleFluent Succession Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 32 of 93 | 22% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PeopleFluent Succession Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 → 31 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 32 of 93 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PeopleFluent Succession Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PeopleFluent Succession Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PeopleFluent or Cornerstone OnDemand are designed for compliance‑heavy environments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative
“PeopleFluent is highly specialized and visually intuitive for scenario modeling” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Succession planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Configurable Talent Processes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“more enterprise-oriented and is usually a better fit for larger or more regulated organizations than a typical mid-market B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · Succession planning · direct prompt · soft negative
“PeopleFluent - Why be cautious:” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Succession planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleFluent Succession Management, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleFluent Succession Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleFluent Succession Management, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleFluent Succession Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleFluent Succession Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named PeopleFluent Succession Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
skillpanel.com22
engagedly.com21
darwinbox.com17
guideflow.com17
talentguard.com16
firsthr.app15
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
teammeter.com11
workhuman.com10
monday.com9
151 of the 151 domain citations in answers naming PeopleFluent Succession Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
peoplefluent.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PeopleFluent Succession Management takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
peoplefluent.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PeopleFluent Succession Management takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
5
Position for “succession planning software”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“peoplefluent succession management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,476 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,000 · 59 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,845
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peoplefluent.com
939
subdomains included
Content
637
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
81 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 450 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | Succession planning, Compensation management | |
| News or press | 59 | undated | Performance management, Compensation management | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 57 | undated | Pay equity, Performance management | ||
| Report or ebook | 37 | undated | Learning management syst, Workforce planning | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2023-05-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 0 | 2021-02-08 | ||
| Case study | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2024-05-29 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-05-22 | Succession planning |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Breaking down silos encouraging agile movement across departments blog
- 2026-09-09Predicting the future using compensation scenario modeling to protect the bottom line blog
- 2026-08-13Redefining lms scalability for the global enterprise blog
- 2026-07-29Strategic succession planning best practices for large organizations blog
- 2026-07-15Navigating complexity why enterprise compensation demands more than an hris module blog
- 2026-07-09Why your lms interface might be endangering enterprise compliance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peoplefluent.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (15); 12 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PeopleFluent Succession Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PeopleFluent Succession Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
PeopleFluent 8
Follow PeopleFluent Succession Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PeopleFluent Succession Management is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PeopleFluent Succession Management is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- Close BrothersHumentumMedical College of WisconsinPenn Medicine
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What PeopleFluent Succession Management's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: peoplefluent.com, peoplefluent.com/products, peoplefluent.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleFluent Succession Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleFluent Succession Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PeopleFluent Succession Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PeopleFluent Succession Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PeopleFluent Succession Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.