Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 28 of 88
2 categories · Named, not rankedEmpxtrack
16Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Empxtrack was named 9 times in Succession planning and 1 other category, where Lattice led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business28 of 91
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 93
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise24 of 82
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Empxtrack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 2% | 11 of 93 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 84 of 140 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | goneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Empxtrack held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 11 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 → 29 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | 8% | 2% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 11 of 93 |
| Compensation management | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 84 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Empxtrack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Empxtrack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PerformYard and Empxtrack offer the lowest per-user pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice
“Budget-conscious, mid-market companies that want deep, customizable succession tracking on a budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative
“like Empxtrack, are suitable for HR teams that run repeatable succession cycles” Llama 4 Maverick · Succession planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“If budget is near zero, start with Empxtrack's free HR offerings” Muse Glimmer 30B · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Empxtrack, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Empxtrack was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Empxtrack, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Empxtrack was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Empxtrack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Empxtrack and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app11
talentguard.com10
workhuman.com9
engagedly.com8
guideflow.com8
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
skillpanel.com8
sourceforge.net6
monday.com5
darwinbox.com4
Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Empxtrack came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
empxtrack.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Empxtrack takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
empxtrack.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Empxtrack takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“empxtrack”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 24,763 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,567 · 125 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,532
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown April 2025, as Saigun Technologies Pvt. Ltd., verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on empxtrack.com
1,487
subdomains included
Content
698
counted in the table below
Documentation
357
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 513 | 15 | 2026-09-25 | Performance management, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| News or press | 116 | 0 | 2025-01-27 | Performance management, Payroll software | |
| Case study | 38 | 0 | 2026-03-10 | Performance management, Payroll software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2025-10-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2025-12-04 | Employee onboarding | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2013-03-19 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-12 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2013-03-12 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2009-03-17 | Performance management |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Recent hr trends 2027 blog
- 2026-09-17Payroll processing philippines blog
- 2026-09-16Payroll processing nigeria blog
- 2026-09-14Payroll processing thailand blog
- 2026-09-10Payroll processing in kuwait blog
- 2026-09-08Payroll processing south africa blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page empxtrack.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (37); 5 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Empxtrack
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Empxtrack is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Empxtrack is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Human Resource Management Software (HRMS)
- For
- startups, SMBs, and enterprise organizations
- Price stated
- Free offerings; Enterprise Solutions empxtrack.com
- Starting price
- 20 empxtrack.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start Now for Free; Free for 10 employees empxtrack.com
- Certifications
- GDPR Compliance
- Customers named
- Southern College of OptometryHCLWarner BrothersUAE ExchangeBenettonBusch LLC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Empxtrack's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: empxtrack.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Empxtrack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Empxtrack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Empxtrack by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Empxtrack is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Empxtrack, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.