AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Moodle LMS · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Moodle LMS

2Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Moodle LMS was named 1 time in Learning management syst, where TalentLMS led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Moodle LMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%51 of 61100%1under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Moodle LMS held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Learning management syst · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 44 of 55, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Learning management syst0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 51 of 61, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Moodle LMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“while the software is free and open source, managed hosting (MoodleCloud) starts at approximately $80–$120/month, and self-hosted versions require server costs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning management syst · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Moodle LMS, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Moodle LMS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TalentLMS2 of 21Not among the top eight
Absorb LMS1 of 20Not among the top eight
Blackboard Learn1 of 20Not among the top eight
Cornerstone Learn1 of 20Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand1 of 20Not among the top eight
Docebo1 of 20Not among the top eight
GoSkills1 of 20Not among the top eight
Mitti1 of 20Not among the top eight
Moodle1 of 20Not among the top eight
SAP Litmos1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Moodle LMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Moodle LMS and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

moodle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Moodle LMS takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “lms for employee training”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning management systems”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 159,371 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,831 · 748 in the top three
Sites linking to it
28,685
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
29 ads · 29 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Moodle Pty Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 23 in the year, 6 before. 14 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on moodle.com
9,257
subdomains included
Content
1,325
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
20 · 123
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,251252026-09-23
Case study2532026-09-18
Conference or event1902024-01-17
Podcast or video1302026-05-12
Report or ebook902024-04-22
Webinar or virtual event302023-12-25
Blog202023-10-18
Glossary or explainer2undated
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page moodle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Moodle LMS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Moodle LMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Moodle LMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Moodle LMS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Moodle LMS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Moodle LMS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at moodle.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.