AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › monday.com Work Management · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

monday.com Work Management

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. monday.com Work Management was named 1 time in Succession planning, where Lattice led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named monday.com Work Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%63 of 930%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, monday.com Work Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Succession planning · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 56 → 52 of 88
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 57 of 87, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Succession planning0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 63 of 93, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated monday.com Work Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“monday.com Work Management (Best Flexible Low-Cost Customizable Tool)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as monday.com Work Management, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and monday.com Work Management was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SuccessionNow1 of 21Not among the top eight
Teamflect1 of 21Not among the top eight
BambooHR1 of 20Not among the top eight
Creately1 of 20Not among the top eight
Google Sheets1 of 20Not among the top eight
OrangeHRM1 of 20Not among the top eight
Paycor1 of 20Not among the top eight
PerformYard1 of 20Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development1 of 20Not among the top eight
Successionly1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named monday.com Work Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named monday.com Work Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app2
g2.com2
monday.comYour site2
skillpanel.com2
softwareadvice.com2
aihr.com1
capterra.com1
engagedly.com1
featuredcustomers.com1
getapp.com1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming monday.com Work Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

monday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, monday.com Work Management takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“monday.com work management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 691,961 a month
Searches its site ranks for
66,810 · 3,856 in the top three
Sites linking to it
73,994
Paid Google search
7 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $164 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
119+ ads · 71 text, 37 video, 11 image · 119 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as monday.com LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 91 in the year, 28 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 63 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on monday.com
11,054
subdomains included
Content
3,300
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,905
Product · Integration
97 · 30
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog2,59802025-12-23
Template or tool18902026-02-18
Comparison16952026-08-31
Case study13872026-09-28
News or press6102026-06-09
Glossary or explainer5332026-09-15
Conference or event5152026-08-15
Webinar or virtual event3212026-07-13
Report or ebook802026-01-26
Podcast or video1undated

Events in person

Upcoming
  • October 28, 2026Elevate 2026: NYCJavits Center, New York, USA · hosts
  • November 24, 2026Elevate 2026: EMEAExcel London - Royal Victoria Dock, 1 Western Gateway, London E16 1XL, UK, London, UK · hosts
Last twelve months

As the event pages on monday.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page monday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow monday.com Work Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

monday.com Work Management is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
a work management platform that helps teams plan, track, and manage any type of work
For
teams
Price stated
Free forever plan up to 2 seats; Basic $9 seat / month; Standard $12 seat / month; Pro $19 seat / month; Enterprise custom price. monday.com/pricing
Starting price
9 monday.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
No credit card needed ✦ Unlimited time on Free plan monday.com
Integrations claimed
250000 monday.com/pricing
Certifications
GDPR complianceISO certifiedAICPA SOCHIPAAISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27018SOC 2SOC 1
Customers named
MotorolaMcDonald’sCanvaVMLMcDonaldsCarrefourCoca-ColaLions Gate
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What monday.com Work Management's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: monday.com, monday.com/pricing, trust.monday.com, monday.com/features/files, monday.com/w/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when monday.com Work Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as monday.com Work Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for monday.com Work Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where monday.com Work Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name monday.com Work Management, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at monday.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.