Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 16 of 50
1 category · Named, not rankedMentorgain
15Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mentorgain was named 7 times in Mentoring software, where Together led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 54
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 77
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 44
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mentorgain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 2% | 12 of 77 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Together at 28% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mentorgain held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Mentoring software · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 3 → 10 of 74
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 17 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | 12% | 2% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 12 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mentorgain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mentorgain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best employee mentoring platform for a mid-sized B2B company would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar.” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mentorgain and PushFar also perform well for this segment” MiniMax M2.5 · Mentoring software · direct prompt · alternative
“A strong choice for mid-market teams that want fast deployment” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · direct prompt · alternative
“Mentorgain (Best for Global Teams on a Tight Budget)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mentorgain, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mentorgain was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mentorgain, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mentorgain was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mentorgain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Mentorgain and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qooper.io12
brancher.com.au9
firsthr.app6
g2.com6
getapp.com6
growthmentor.com6
mentorcruise.com6
sourceforge.net6
group.app5
guideflow.com5
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Mentorgain came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mentorgain.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mentorgain takes 2% of first choices and Together takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mentorgain.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mentorgain takes 2% of first choices and Together takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mentoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mentoring program software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“mentorgain”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 337 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 174 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 131
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 77 in mentoring software
Segment leader
28%
Together
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mentorgain.com
148
subdomains included
Content
105
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 89 | 26 | 2026-09-28 | Mentoring software, Talent intelligence | |
| Comparison | 11 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | Mentoring software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | Mentoring software | |
| Case study | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28How to ask someone to be your mentor blog
- 2026-09-25Mentoring program goals examples blog
- 2026-09-24Intergenerational conflict workplace mentoring blog
- 2026-09-23Mentoring program metrics kpis blog
- 2026-09-22Ai learning workplace mentoring blog
- 2026-09-09Soft skills in the workplace blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mentorgain.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Mentorgain
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mentorgain; a claim can dispute any of them.
MentorGain 1
Follow Mentorgain
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mentorgain is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mentorgain is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered mentoring platform for modern workplaces. Smart matching, goal tracking, and real impact — live in 1–2 weeks.
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- INR and USD pricing mentorgain.com
- Starting price
- Rs. 3,80,000 /year mentorgain.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPR
- Customers named
- Zee MediaPiramalSEAP GurukulJosh Software
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Mentorgain's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mentorgain.com, mentorgain.com/pricing, mentorgain.com/features/ai-buddy, mentorgain.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mentorgain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mentorgain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mentorgain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mentorgain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mentorgain, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.