Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 40 → 43 of 50
1 category · Named, not rankedMentorCloud
11Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MentorCloud was named 7 times in Mentoring software, where Together led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business39 of 54
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 77
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise14 of 44
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MentorCloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 2% | 11 of 77 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Together at 28% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MentorCloud held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Mentoring software · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 11 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 13 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 11 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MentorCloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MentorCloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MentorCloud is frequently the most cost-effective paid option (~$4/user/year at scale)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice
“MentorCloud basic from under $4/person/yr is the lowest published per-person annual rate in the 2026 comparisons.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if you want a mid-market/enterprise HR-L&D fit: Chronus or MentorCloud” Perplexity Sonar · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“MentorCloud ($4/person) - Good if you have 500+ employees and want per-user pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MentorCloud, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MentorCloud was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MentorCloud, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MentorCloud was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MentorCloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named MentorCloud and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com10
sourceforge.net10
qooper.io9
softwareadvice.com8
capterra.com7
g2.com7
adplist.org6
chronus.com6
growthmentor.com6
gartner.com5
Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming MentorCloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mentorcloud.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MentorCloud takes 2% of first choices and Together takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mentorcloud.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MentorCloud takes 2% of first choices and Together takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mentoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mentoring program software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“mentorcloud”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 177 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 240 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 744
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 77 in mentoring software
Segment leader
28%
Together
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mentorcloud.com
468
subdomains included
Content
271
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 254 | 0 | 2023-04-18 | Mentoring software | |
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2015-04-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2013-07-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2016-01-20 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2020-10-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2023-04-18How to eliminate job burnout with humanistic employee engagement blog
- 2022-04-077 signs its time to invest in a mentoring platform blog
- 2020-10-08A growth oriented business case study for successful mentoring program case study
- 2016-01-20Webinar engaging millennials through mentorship with dr luis velasquez webinar or virtual event
- 2015-10-292015 10 29 web worthy a weekly mentoring roundup october 23 october 29 blog
- 2015-10-222015 10 22 web worthy a weekly mentoring roundup october 16 october 22 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mentorcloud.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MentorCloud
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MentorCloud is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MentorCloud is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-enabled platform to catalyze mentoring connections on a global scale
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Basic < 4 per person billed annually; Premium < 4 per person billed annually; Enterprise For 2,500+ Employees mentorcloud.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 4 mentorcloud.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start with a 30 day commitment- free trial mentorcloud.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001
- Customers named
- Marriott InternationalASBAMerck GroupSeven West MediaMarriott
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What MentorCloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mentorcloud.com, mentorcloud.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MentorCloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MentorCloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MentorCloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MentorCloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MentorCloud, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.