Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 25 of 108
1 category · Named, not rankedLeonar
11Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leonar was named 3 times in Recruiting CRM, where Gem led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 114
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 111
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Leonar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 34 of 111 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Leonar held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 → 33 of 108
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 34 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Leonar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Leonar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tools like Juicebox, Fetcher, or Leonar offer free tiers to test functionality” Kimi K2 · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leonar, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leonar was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leonar, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leonar was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leonar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Leonar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
leonar.appYour site11
pin.com10
lever.co9
intervue.io6
gem.com4
selectsoftwarereviews.com3
g2.com2
greenhouse.com2
guideflow.com2
juicebox.ai2
Forty of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Leonar came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leonar.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leonar takes 0% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leonar.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leonar takes 0% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “candidate sourcing tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 60,500 a month (“leonar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 22,298 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 701 · 26 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 213
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
Segment leader
15%
Gem
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leonar.app
652
subdomains included
Content
125
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
21 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 85 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 36 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leonar.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Leonar
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Leonar is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Leonar is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The modern ATS and CRM built for recruiting agencies, executive search firms, and headhunting agencies.
- For
- recruiting agencies, executive search firms, and headhunting agencies
- Price stated
- Public software pricing, tailored programme on request leonar.app
- Starting price
- 149 leonar.app
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial leonar.app
- Customers named
- GymlibOnos TalentsDiduenjoylicorne society
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Leonar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leonar.app, leonar.app/pricing, leonar.app/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leonar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leonar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leonar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Leonar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leonar, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.