AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Learn Amp · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Learn Amp

16Judge labels
6First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Learning experience plat for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 89 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Learn Amp →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Learn Amp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Learning experience platformsLearning and development12%5 of 890%14accepted challenger▼−17Since September 2026: 28% → 11%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Learn Amp moved past the floor in its one category, Learning experience plat, −17 points to 11%.

Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 → 21 of 74
Mid-market▼−17Since September 2026: 28% → 11%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 28% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 → 5 of 84
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Learning experience plat28%11%▼−17Since September 2026: 28% → 11%, −17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Moved past the floorRank 1 → 5 of 89

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Learn Amp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B11002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase8 labels4
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Learn Amp if you want an all-in-one solution with robust engagement features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation would be Learn Amp for most mid-sized B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“highlighted as the best all-in-one mid-market learning platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · first choice
“Mid-market LXP | 360Learning, Learn Amp, Learnerbly” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Learn Amp, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Learn Amp was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Continu7 of 160Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand3 of 160Not among the top eight
LearnUpon2 of 160Not among the top eight
Thinkific2 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Learn Amp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Learn Amp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com13
digitalhumans.com11
360learning.com9
g2.com9
guideflow.com8
thirst.io7
walkme.com7
techtarget.com6
absorbai.com5
capterra.com5

Eighty of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Learn Amp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

learnamp.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Learn Amp takes 12% of first choices and 360Learning takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “learning experience platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning experience platforms”
2
Searches for its name, Google
210 a month (“learn amp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 431 a month
Searches its site ranks for
324 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,029
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Rise To Ltd, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
12%
rank 5 of 89 in learning experience plat
Segment leader
26%
360Learning
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on learnamp.com
252
subdomains included
Content
240
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog23302026-06-17Learning experience plat, Learning management syst
Conference or event2undated
Comparison2undatedLearning experience plat
Glossary or explainer2undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page learnamp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Learn Amp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Learn Amp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Learn Amp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Learn Amp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Learn Amp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Learn Amp, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at learnamp.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.