Index › Products › Intch · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Intch

5Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intch was named 5 times in Job advertising and 1 other category, where JobTarget led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market109 of 111

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	109 of 111	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	96 of 102	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, Intch held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Job advertising · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 107 → 101 of 103

EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Job advertising	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 107 → 109 of 111
Internal talent marketpl	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 113 → 96 of 102

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Intch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Intch, for example, has received recent warnings for using deceptive billing practices, sending spam calls upon registration, and making it extremely difficult to cancel subscriptions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“Platforms to Avoid Completely... 1. Intch (and similar "AI-match" startup apps) - Why avoid: This is the clearest example of a platform with a "subscription trap" reputation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“Intch is cited as a subscription trap example... delivering recurring charges you can't easily cancel, fake listings, and immediate spam calls after registration.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · hard negative

“Some of the job platforms to avoid include Intch, which has been accused of subscription traps and unverified listings.” Llama 4 Maverick · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intch, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intch was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Indeed3 of 51Not among the top eight

LinkedIn Jobs3 of 50Not among the top eight

Fiverr2 of 50Not among the top eight

Upwork2 of 50Not among the top eight

FlexJobs1 of 51Not among the top eight

AngelList1 of 50Not among the top eight

Behance1 of 50Not among the top eight

CareerBuilder1 of 50Not among the top eight

Craigslist1 of 50Not among the top eight

Facebook Jobs1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Intch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

linkedin.com5

consumer.ftc.gov4

hrmorning.com2

pandologic.com2

pcmag.com2

scamadviser.com2

staysafeonline.org2

totaldefense.com2

upwork.com2

us.norton.com2

No domain is on file for Intch, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

linkedin.com/posts/fiona-de-villiers_ethical-give-activistsrevealcorruption-activity-742945

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2023/05/scammers-are-hijacking-job-ads-heres-how-spot-fak3

hrmorning.com/articles/bad-job-boards2

pandologic.com/employers/recruitment-strategy/biggest-job-ad-sites-arent-always-the-best2

pcmag.com/explainers/avoid-online-job-post-scams-with-these-7-tips2

scamadviser.com/articles/15-legit-online-job-sites-to-find-real-jobs-and-avoid-scams2

staysafeonline.org/articles/stay-secure-while-job-hunting2

totaldefense.com/security-blog/job-board-safety-guide-how-to-avoid-employment-scams-on-fak2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Intch stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 6,600 a month (“intch”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 141 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 109 of 111 in job advertising

Segment leader

23%

JobTarget

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 5 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Intch

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Intch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Intch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Intch, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.