Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 87 of 138, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedIBM
5Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. IBM was named 2 times in Compensation benchmarkin and 1 other category, where Pave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market97 of 148
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise92 of 130
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named IBM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 97 of 148 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 89 of 98 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, IBM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation benchmarkin · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 80 of 115, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 97 of 148, unchanged |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated IBM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated IBM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Powerful, but extremely expensive and complex. Often avoided by anyone other than Fortune 100 companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named IBM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
checkr.com2
gitnux.org2
verifiedmarketreports.com2
wifitalents.com2
worldmetrics.org2
zipdo.co2
24marketreports.com1
arena.ai1
avasant.com1
bamboohr.com1
Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming IBM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ibm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, IBM takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ibm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, IBM takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “benchmarking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “salary benchmarking data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 201,000 a month (“ibm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 34,098 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 31,137,701 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 562,131 · 83,264 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 426,759
- Paid Google search
- 21 searches its ads show for, about 177 clicks and $2,518 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 97 of 148 in compensation benchmarkin
Segment leader
19%
Pave
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ibm.com
12,886
subdomains included
Content
2,707
counted in the table below
Documentation
14
Product · Integration
2,160 · 81
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 1,341 | 3 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| News or press | 882 | 4 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 192 | 3 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 97 | 28 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Blog | 69 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 50 | 9 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | 3 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 14 | 9 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 0 | 2026-02-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ai forecasters new opportunity business hire humans too news or press
- 2026-09-25Eth zurich robot hand walks on fingers news or press
- 2026-09-25New frontier ai models podcast or video
- 2026-09-23From ai pilots autonomous ams blog
- 2026-09-23Shadow ai has reached soc security teams blind spots blog
- 2026-09-23Ai labs ignoring cybersecurity podcast or video
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 9, 2026Mizuho Technology ConferenceNew York · spoke
- March 3, 20262026 Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom ConferenceSan Francisco · spoke
As the event pages on ibm.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ibm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as IBM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM; a claim can dispute any of them.
IBM (Kenexa/Business Analytics) 1
Follow IBM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
IBM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
IBM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- For more than a century, IBM has been a global technology innovator, leading advances in AI, automation and hybrid cloud solutions that help businesses grow.
- For
- businesses
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free ibm.com/trust
- Customers named
- APIS ITSecurityScorecardNORD/LBVolkswagen Group ServicesCrushBankRivertyCitadelleBroadridge
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What IBM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ibm.com, ibm.com/trust, ibm.com/products/z, ibm.com/case-studies, ibm.com/consulting/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where IBM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.