Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · Named, not rankedGoodfit
8Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Goodfit was named 5 times in Technical hiring assessm and 1 other category, where HackerRank led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 61
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 71
3%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise18 of 43
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Goodfit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 3% | 9 of 71 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 66 of 118 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Goodfit held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 19 → 9 of 67
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 of 41, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 9 of 71 |
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 66 of 118 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Goodfit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Goodfit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Goodfit is often highlighted as the best coding assessment platform for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · Technical hiring assessm · direct prompt · first choice
“The best coding assessment platform for a mid-market B2B company is Goodfit” Llama 4 Maverick · Technical hiring assessm · direct prompt · first choice
“A modern, startup-friendly platform. They offer a generous free trial (20 assessments)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · alternative
“3. Goodfit \u2014 Best for Volume Screening” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Goodfit, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Goodfit was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Goodfit, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Goodfit was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Goodfit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Goodfit and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
goodfit.soYour site8
hackerrank.com6
selectsoftwarereviews.com4
itechguides.com3
adaface.com2
codesignal.com2
codesubmit.io2
fueler.io2
hiretruffle.com2
interviewcost.com2
Twenty-five of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Goodfit came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on goodfit.so
452
subdomains included
Content
48
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
27 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 27 | undated | Applicant tracking syste, Candidate assessment | ||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Blog | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page goodfit.so exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Goodfit
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Goodfit is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Goodfit is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Voice AI for HR teams: Hire, Train and Retain
- For
- HR teams
- Price stated
- 20 free assessments, no card needed. Then $3 per assessment. No seats or annual contract goodfit.so
- Starting price
- 3 goodfit.so
- Free plan or trial
- 20 free assessments, no card needed goodfit.so
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type II compliantDPDP Act 2023
- Hosting
- Mumbai, India
- Customers named
- LogileSpringworksBajaj CapitalSomany CeramicsZokoPocketpillsXcelore
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Goodfit's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: goodfit.so, goodfit.so/pricing, goodfit.so/security, goodfit.so/product/ats, goodfit.so/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Goodfit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Goodfit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Goodfit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Goodfit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Goodfit, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.