Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 31 of 100, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedFlock
4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Flock was named 2 times in Frontline employee apps and 1 other category, where Connecteam led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market35 of 106
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Flock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 35 of 106 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Whistleblowing and investigations | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 88 of 107 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FaceUp at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Flock held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 106, unchanged |
| Whistleblowing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 88 of 107, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Flock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Flock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“budget-friendly Slack-like choice with a free tier and low paid pricing, but it is more collaboration-focused” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be especially cautious of Flock and certain AI-driven data fusion tools used in policing.” Mistral Small · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flock, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flock was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flock, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flock was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Flock and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com4
firsthr.app3
joinblink.com3
learn.g2.com3
gartner.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
aclu.org1
appcues.com1
betterworks.com1
brennancenter.org1
Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Flock came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on flock.com
424
subdomains included
Content
386
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 357 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Case study | 15 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-23Best ai tools for marketing blog
- 2026-06-25Best workforce productivity tools for modern teams blog
- 2026-06-17Best free logo makers blog
- 2026-05-29Best free business card makers blog
- 2026-05-19Best no code website builders blog
- 2026-05-12Best virtual assistant companies blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page flock.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Flock
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Flock is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Flock is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the best team communication app and online collaboration platform
- For
- Growing businesses
- Price stated
- Special PRO pricing: 30% discount on our PRO pricing. Regular Price: $3 Special Price: $2 flock.com/pricing-plan-updates
- Starting price
- 2 flock.com/pricing-plan-updates
- Free plan or trial
- 30-Day Free Trial flock.com
- Customers named
- Ryonic RobotsDrama Kids of North ColumbusNamecheap
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Flock's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: flock.com, flock.com/pricing-plan-updates. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Flock by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Flock is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Flock, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.