Every category where a model named Convercent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Whistleblowing and investigations	Core HR and payroll	4%	10 of 107	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by FaceUp at 25%
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	59 of 92	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Convercent yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Convercent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with Convercent/OneTrust or NAVEX Global” MiniMax M2.5 · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The Best Overall for Mid-Sized Scale: Convercent” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose Convercent if your main goal is tying every piece of employee feedback back to specific training and policy modules.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Whistleblowing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Treat EQS as the relevant current vendor in a new evaluation, and ask about support or migration if you have a legacy Convercent deployment.” GPT-6 Luna · Whistleblowing · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Convercent, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Convercent was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NAVEX One18 of 258Not among the top eight

EthicsPoint7 of 252Not among the top eight

Whispli7 of 252Not among the top eight

Whistlelink7 of 251Not among the top eight

FaceUp5 of 253Not among the top eight

Case IQ5 of 250Not among the top eight

Ethico5 of 250Not among the top eight

AllVoices4 of 250Not among the top eight

SpeakUp4 of 250Not among the top eight

EQS Integrity Line3 of 250Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Convercent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 25 answers that named Convercent and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

navex.com14

whistlelink.com11

speakup.com9

hracuity.com8

diligent.com7

ethico.com7

faceup.com7

guideflow.com7

ordio.com7

gitnux.org6

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Convercent came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

navex.com/en-us/platform/whistleblowing-software-solutions7

navex.com/en-us/platform/whistleblowing-software-solutions/ethicspoint-essentials7

diligent.com/resources/blog/best-whistleblowing-software6

ethico.com/hotline-case-management6

ordio.com/en/insights/guides/whistleblowing-software6

speakup.com/blog/top-ethics-hotline-providers6

whistlelink.com/en-us/blog/best-whistleblowing-software-2026-top-rated-digital-solutions6

gitnux.org/best/ethics-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

convercent.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Convercent takes 4% of first choices and FaceUp takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“convercent”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 34 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,266 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 813 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,608
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 107 in whistleblowing

Segment leader

25%

FaceUp

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on convercent.com

546

subdomains included

Content

480

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

21 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Blog	422	undated
Report or ebook	18	undated
Webinar or virtual event	17	undated
Conference or event	6	undated
Case study	5	undated
Podcast or video	5	undated
Template or tool	4	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Comparison	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page convercent.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Convercent

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Convercent; a claim can dispute any of them.

Convercent (Now part of OneTrust) 1Convercent (now part of OneTrust) 1

Follow Convercent

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Convercent is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Leading Ethics and Compliance Solution
convercent.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Service Organization
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Convercent's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: convercent.com, convercent.com/pricing, convercent.com/products/campaigns, convercent.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Convercent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Convercent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Convercent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Convercent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Convercent, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.