AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › AllVoices · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

AllVoices

36Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Whistleblowing for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of AllVoices →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In whistleblowing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AllVoices for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Whistleblowing and investigationsCore HR and payroll4%7 of 1070%15accepted challenger
HR help desk and case managementOnboarding and employee experience2%20 of 1080%2under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AllVoices yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AllVoices across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels4
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a standard, tech-forward mid-sized B2B company, AllVoices is the most well-rounded option to build a positive culture of trust.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“AllVoices is a strong choice if you prioritize employee relations and case management with good support” Mistral Small · HR help desk · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: AllVoices ... For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd start with AllVoices.” Kimi K2 · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider it when employee accessibility and HR workflows are central; validate whether its controls and compliance capabilities fit your program.” GPT-6 Luna · Whistleblowing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AllVoices, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AllVoices was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ethico8 of 360Not among the top eight
NAVEX EthicsPoint7 of 364Not among the top eight
EQS Integrity Line7 of 360Not among the top eight
SpeakUp7 of 360Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AllVoices. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 36 answers that named AllVoices and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

faceup.com23
navex.com20
guideflow.com18
ordio.com18
whistlelink.com16
elker.com12
firsthr.app11
speakup.com11
g2.com10
gartner.com10

149 of the 149 domain citations in answers naming AllVoices came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

allvoices.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AllVoices takes 4% of first choices and FaceUp takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“allvoices”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 258,973 a month
Searches its site ranks for
32,248 · 890 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,978
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
23 ads · 20 text, 3 video · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as AllVoices Holding Co., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 13 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 107 in whistleblowing
Segment leader
25%
FaceUp
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
36 answers
Its own site cited
in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on allvoices.co
1,793
subdomains included
Content
1,701
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
32 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer83102026-06-10Benefits administration, Performance management
Podcast or video40482026-09-24People analytics
Blog34472026-08-13Performance management
Webinar or virtual event8402025-03-21People analytics
Case study16undated
Report or ebook14undated
Comparison802022-10-25
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page allvoices.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow AllVoices

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AllVoices is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-native employee relations platform
For
HR & ER teams
Price stated
Starts at $275 / month allvoices.co/pricing
Starting price
275 allvoices.co/pricing
Integrations claimed
50 allvoices.co
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2GDPRCCPAISO 27001
Hosting
US
Customers named
BungieLucky Strike EntertainmentChipotleElectronic Arts (EA)Sweetgreen
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial

What AllVoices's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: allvoices.co, allvoices.co, allvoices.co/pricing, trust.allvoices.co, allvoices.co/solutions/tech. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AllVoices's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AllVoices, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AllVoices by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AllVoices is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AllVoices, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at allvoices.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.