Every category where a model named Case IQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Whistleblowing and investigations	Core HR and payroll	4%	8 of 107	0%	11	accepted challenger
HR help desk and case management	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	44 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Case IQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Case IQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	2	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels1

Paraphrase15 labels3

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best overall fit: Case IQ — ... I would choose Case IQ because the available results emphasize the core features a mid-sized company usually needs most” Perplexity Sonar · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“My default pick: Case IQ” GPT-6 Luna · Whistleblowing · direct prompt · first choice

“A useful candidate when investigation handling and reporting are as important as the reporting channel itself.” GPT-6 Luna · Whistleblowing · comparative prompt · alternative

“The powerhouse for internal investigators. Best For: Legal, HR, and compliance teams with high case volumes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Whistleblowing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Case IQ, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Case IQ was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NAVEX One30 of 5014Compare →

FaceUp19 of 507Compare →

Whispli17 of 502Compare →

EQS Integrity Line13 of 501Not among the top eight

HR Acuity13 of 501Not among the top eight

Whistlelink12 of 502Compare →

SpeakUp12 of 500Not among the top eight

Ethico11 of 501Not among the top eight

Whistleblower Software11 of 501Compare →

EthicsPoint10 of 504Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Case IQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 50 answers that named Case IQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

navex.com34

caseiq.comYour site24

g2.com23

ordio.com22

guideflow.com21

faceup.com19

whistlelink.com18

firsthr.app15

zipdo.co15

gartner.com13

180 of the 204 domain citations in answers naming Case IQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

navex.com/en-us/platform/whistleblowing-software-solutions21

ordio.com/en/insights/guides/whistleblowing-software21

firsthr.app/compare/general/whistleblower-platform14

gartner.com/reviews/market/whistleblowing-software12

guideflow.com/blog/whistleblowing-software12

navex.com/en-us/platform/whistleblowing-software-solutions/ethicspoint-essentials12

whistlelink.com/en-us/blog/best-whistleblowing-software-2026-top-rated-digital-solutions12

elker.com/articles/whistleblowing-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

caseiq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Case IQ takes 4% of first choices and FaceUp takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“case iq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 20 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 11,839 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 7,258 · 240 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,804
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

73 ads · 67 text, 5 image, 1 video · 37 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as Tosanwumi Martey, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 26 in the year, 47 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 107 in whistleblowing

Segment leader

25%

FaceUp

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 50 answers
Its own site cited: in 50 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on caseiq.com

2,335

subdomains included

Content

1,820

counted in the table below

Documentation

211

Product · Integration

13 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	1,291	3	2026-09-22
Webinar or virtual event	155	4	2026-09-18
Report or ebook	119	1	2026-09-03
News or press	96	0	2023-10-17
Template or tool	74	0	2026-02-06
Case study	37	0	2025-05-29
Glossary or explainer	30	0	2025-07-06
Comparison	11	0	2024-02-27
Conference or event	5	0	2024-07-02
Podcast or video	2	0	2025-03-06

Most recent

2026-09-22Compliance technology transforming compliance blog
2026-09-18Compliance officer reporting lines best practices in the uk and europe webinar or virtual event
2026-09-03What the dojs august 2026 memo means for uk and eu compliance teams report or ebook
2026-08-26What case iqs 2026 benchmark says about investigation resource planning blog
2026-08-17The pros and cons of conducting virtual investigative interviews webinar or virtual event
2026-07-28Bridging credibility gaps in your compliance investigations presenting the case iq 2026 benchmark report webinar or virtual event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page caseiq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Case IQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Case IQ; a claim can dispute any of them.

Case IQ (formerly i-Sight) 1Case IQ (i-Sight) 1

Follow Case IQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Case IQ is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: End-to-end risk management software for case management, whistleblower hotline, compliance monitoring, third-party management, and approvals & disclosures.
caseiq.com
For: organizations that need to investigate issues and proactively manage compliance; ethics, compliance, HR, security, fraud, and investigations teams
caseiq.com
Certifications: SOC 2 certifiedSOC 2 Type II complianceGDPR-readySOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022SSAE SOC 2 Type IIHIPAAGDPR
Customers named: Home Health Care ManagementParTech, Inc.REDI Services Inc.Valfilm USAExxonUCLAUPSMercedes-Benz
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Case IQ's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: caseiq.com, caseiq.com/pricing, caseiq.com/platform, caseiq.com/resources/case-studies, caseiq.com/platform/features/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Case IQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Case IQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Case IQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Case IQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Case IQ, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.