AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › ComplianceHR · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ComplianceHR

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ComplianceHR was named 4 times in HR compliance, where Rippling led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hr compliance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ComplianceHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll0%31 of 970%4under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, ComplianceHR held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · HR compliance · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 33 of 66, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 35 of 91, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
HR compliance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 31 of 97, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ComplianceHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Organizations with complex employment-law questions or higher legal risk” GPT-6 Luna · HR compliance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ComplianceHR, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ComplianceHR was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Rippling3 of 51Not among the top eight
BambooHR3 of 50Not among the top eight
SixFifty3 of 50Not among the top eight
Gusto2 of 52Not among the top eight
HR Acuity2 of 51Not among the top eight
Mitratech Mineral2 of 51Not among the top eight
BLR HR Hero2 of 50Not among the top eight
Deel2 of 50Not among the top eight
Justworks2 of 50Not among the top eight
Paycor2 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ComplianceHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named ComplianceHR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brightmine.com2
compliancehr.comYour site2
gitnux.org2
guideflow.com2
lathire.com2
paycor.com2
rippling.com2
selleo.com2
sixfifty.com2
adp.com1

Seventeen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming ComplianceHR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

compliancehr.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ComplianceHR takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “hr compliance tools”
2
Position for “hr compliance software”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 97 in HR compliance
Segment leader
19%
Rippling
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on compliancehr.com
338
subdomains included
Content
154
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog13812026-08-14HR compliance
Webinar or virtual event612026-09-23
Comparison512026-08-05HR compliance
Template or tool302026-01-01
Podcast or video1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page compliancehr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ComplianceHR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ComplianceHR; a claim can dispute any of them.
ComplianceHR (Littler) 1

Follow ComplianceHR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ComplianceHR is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Simplify the complexity of employment law with HR compliance solutions built for human resources, compliance management, and inside counsel.
For
HR professionals, compliance teams, and in-house counsel
Free plan or trial
Try ComplianceHR’s COVID-19 Resource Center Free Through May 15; Try ComplianceHR’s COVID-19 Resource Center and Navigator Suite for Free compliancehr.com
Hosting
United States
Customers named
NeotaNextSourceIES
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications

What ComplianceHR's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: compliancehr.com, compliancehr.com/solutions, compliancehr.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ComplianceHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ComplianceHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ComplianceHR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ComplianceHR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ComplianceHR, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at compliancehr.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.