Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 57 of 115, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedBrilliant Assessments
1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Brilliant Assessments was named 1 time in Candidate assessment, where TestGorilla led with 52%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market59 of 118
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Brilliant Assessments for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 59 of 118 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Brilliant Assessments held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 59 of 118, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Brilliant Assessments across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Brilliant Assessments across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Brilliant Assessments, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brilliant Assessments was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Brilliant Assessments, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brilliant Assessments was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Brilliant Assessments. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Brilliant Assessments and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cangrade.com1
capterra.ca1
capterra.co.uk1
cloudassess.com1
connecteam.com1
educaweb.org1
g2.com1
gitnux.org1
hirevire.com1
lattice.com1
Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Brilliant Assessments came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on brilliantassessments.com
132
subdomains included
Content
41
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 36 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2025-03-08 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-05-1810 creative ways respondents can use ai discuss blog
- 2026-05-11Why integrations matter in enterprise assessment workflows blog
- 2026-05-02Should this be a chart blog
- 2025-07-28Ai interpret feedback prompt master guide blog
- 2025-07-28Ai interpretation scoring prompt master guide blog
- 2025-07-28Ai suggest prompt guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page brilliantassessments.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Brilliant Assessments
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Brilliant Assessments is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Brilliant Assessments is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- White-label Assessment Software
- For
- businesses, coaches, and consultants
- Price stated
- All prices are in $USD. Pay Annually Plans; Pay Monthly Plans; custom price per response for Strategic/Strategy plans; Assessment Building from $1000; SSO Services $500 one-off payment; HRIS and ATS Integration $500 per year; AI Uploads $3000 per year; Starter $299/month for businesses <3 employees, $2,990 per year annually for businesses <3 employees. brilliantassessments.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 299 brilliantassessments.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Brilliant Assessments free today. brilliantassessments.com
- Integrations claimed
- 30 brilliantassessments.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II Certified
- Hosting
- Central CanadaIreland
- Customers named
- Progress CoachingAnderson-SquiresSix Till Sixaction360™Healthy Growing LeadersBest Bar NoneMy Green LabPeople Untapped
What Brilliant Assessments's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: brilliantassessments.com, brilliantassessments.com/pricing, brilliantassessments.com/features/charts, brilliantassessments.com/customer-stories, brilliantassessments.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brilliant Assessments's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brilliant Assessments, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Brilliant Assessments by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Brilliant Assessments is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Brilliant Assessments, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.