AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Bridge · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Bridge

7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bridge was named 2 times in Compliance training and 1 other category, where Traliant led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bridge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compliance trainingLearning and development0%53 of 920%1under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%70 of 1270%1under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Bridge held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compliance training · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 of 61, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 of 89, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 61 of 86, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compliance training0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 53 of 92, unchanged
Skills intelligence0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 70 of 127, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Bridge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bridge, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bridge was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Docebo5 of 71Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand5 of 70Not among the top eight
SAP Litmos4 of 70Not among the top eight
Absorb LMS3 of 70Not among the top eight
TalentLMS3 of 70Not among the top eight
360Learning2 of 70Not among the top eight
Workday Skills Cloud2 of 70Not among the top eight
CompliQuest1 of 71Not among the top eight
Skills Base1 of 71Not among the top eight
TalentGuard1 of 71Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bridge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Bridge and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2
blog.imocha.io1
checkthat.ai1
compliquest.com1
cxeverywhere.com1
cypherlearning.com1
d2l.com1
docebo.com1
easyllama.com1
firsthr.app1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Bridge came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

getbridge.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bridge takes 0% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
246,000 a month (“bridge”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
465,888 a month

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on getbridge.com
571
subdomains included
Content
509
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
5 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog441402026-09-07Performance management, Compliance training
Case study4102026-06-30
News or press712026-09-10
Comparison502026-06-24
Glossary or explainer522026-09-01Learning experience plat
Template or tool4undatedEmployee onboarding
Webinar or virtual event212026-08-06
Podcast or video2undated
Conference or event112026-08-06
Report or ebook1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page getbridge.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (16); 7 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Bridge

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bridge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bridge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bridge by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bridge is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bridge, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at getbridge.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.