HR AI Index

Index › Products › Ayco · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Ayco

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ayco was named 2 times in Financial wellness, where LearnLux led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market44 of 117

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 69

under the label threshold

In financial wellness · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ayco for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Financial wellness platforms	Compensation and total rewards	0%	44 of 117	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ayco yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ayco across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ayco, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ayco was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BrightPlan4 of 42Not among the top eight

Financial Finesse4 of 42Not among the top eight

LearnLux4 of 41Not among the top eight

Enrich Financial Wellness4 of 40Not among the top eight

Mercer4 of 40Not among the top eight

SmartDollar4 of 40Not among the top eight

DailyPay3 of 40Not among the top eight

Nudge Global3 of 40Not among the top eight

Origin3 of 40Not among the top eight

Payactiv3 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ayco. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Ayco and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dataintelo.com4

itechguides.com4

rewordin.com4

compensationtools.net3

guideflow.com3

us.fitgap.com3

brightplan.com2

cxeverywhere.com2

g2.com2

gminsights.com2

Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Ayco came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dataintelo.com/report/financial-wellness-platform-market4

itechguides.com/best/financial-wellness-software4

rewordin.com/blog/best-employee-financial-wellness-platforms-20264

compensationtools.net/best-financial-wellness-software3

guideflow.com/blog/financial-wellness-software3

us.fitgap.com/search/financial-wellness-software/enterprise3

brightplan.com/2

cxeverywhere.com/tools/financial-wellness-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ayco

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ayco; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ayco (Goldman Sachs) 2

Follow Ayco

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ayco is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Financial planning and wealth management for executives, employees, and individuals.
ayco.com
For: Employers; executives, employees, retirees; individual investors.
ayco.com
Certifications: ISO 27001 Certified by Schellman
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Ayco's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ayco.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ayco's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ayco, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ayco by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Ayco is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ayco, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.