| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benefits administration | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 22 of 67 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Gusto at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 23 of 90 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Compt at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HSA and FSA administrators | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 87 of 111 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HealthEquity at 29% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benefits administration | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 22 of 67 |
| Flexible benefits | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 23 of 90 |
| HSA & FSA admin | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 87 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Alight if you want a broad benefits + wellbeing + engagement platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · Flexible benefits · comparative prompt · first choice
“Key players in the Flexible Spending Account FSA Solution Market include Alight Solutions, Discovery Benefits, PayFlex” Muse Glimmer 30B · HSA & FSA admin · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for enterprise complexity: Alight Solutions and bswift, built for large, multi-plan benefit structures.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Benefits administration · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise-grade scale; strong analytics; can handle very complex global benefit programs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Benefits administration · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“High costs associated with change orders and tasks present financial and operational challenges, and some employers find the technology outdated” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Benefits administration · negative prompt · hard negative
“Common gripes include extreme wait times, untrained support, payment delays, lost paperwork” Grok 4.1 Fast · Flexible benefits · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Nightmare" experiences according to users; denies valid claims for no clear reason” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 46 answers that named Alight Solutions and are not a share of its labels.
150 of the 150 domain citations in answers naming Alight Solutions came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Alight Solutions's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: alight.com/thought-leadership/alight-solutions-401-k-index-reports, alight.com/thought-leadership/alight-solutions-401k-index-may-2020, alight.com/thought-leadership/alight-solutions-401k-index-may-2021, alight.com/thought-leadership/alight-solutions-401k-index-may-2022, alight.com/thought-leadership/alight-solutions-401k-index-july-2020. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Alight Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Alight Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Alight Solutions by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: