Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 78 → 26 of 100
5 categories · Named, not rankedWorkleap
17Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workleap was named 6 times in Compensation management and 4 other categories, where Pave led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 108
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 140
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise112 of 126
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workleap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 2% | 24 of 140 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 25 of 68 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 71 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 64 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 83 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workleap held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 112 → 23 of 131
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 99 of 109, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 112 → 24 of 140 |
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 68, unchanged |
| Coaching platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 128, unchanged |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 108, unchanged |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workleap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workleap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with Compensive.io or Workleap if budget modeling is a priority” MiniMax M2.5 · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“modular, AI-powered employee experience platform built for small to mid-sized businesses” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR help desk · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Alternative 3: Workleap (if you live in Slack or Teams)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Workleap often uses a flat monthly fee structure.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workleap, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workleap was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workleap, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workleap was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workleap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Workleap and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com9
g2.com7
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
comprehensive.io4
deel.com4
effy.ai4
learn.g2.com4
bamboohr.com3
captivateiq.com3
hibob.com3
Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Workleap came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workleap.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Workleap takes 2% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workleap.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Workleap takes 2% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compensation platforms”
3
Position for “compensation management software”
1
- Organic visits to its site
- about 67,808 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,903 · 287 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,217
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $740 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 24 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workleap.com
1,693
subdomains included
Content
620
counted in the table below
Documentation
331
Product · Integration
0 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 396 | 2 | 2026-07-21 | Performance management, Employee onboarding | |
| Template or tool | 66 | 0 | 2026-03-15 | Employee onboarding, Performance management | |
| Case study | 42 | undated | Performance management, Compensation management | ||
| Conference or event | 30 | 0 | 2025-06-26 | Performance management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 29 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | Performance management, Compensation management | |
| Report or ebook | 26 | 0 | 2026-03-01 | Performance management, Employee engagement surv | |
| Comparison | 19 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-2313380753 onboarding webinars webinar or virtual event
- 2026-07-21Employee recognition messages examples blog
- 2026-07-21Performance appraisal methods to boost workplace culture blog
- 2026-06-15Benefits of performance management blog
- 2026-05-2713286760 sub goals vs measurements comparison
- 2026-04-09Compensation management software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workleap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (29); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Workleap
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workleap is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Workleap is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The System of Action for Managers; an AI agent that works for managers
- For
- managers; HR
- Integrations claimed
- 100 workleap.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting, customers
What Workleap's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: workleap.com, workleap.com/plans, workleap.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workleap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workleap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workleap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workleap is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workleap, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.