AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Twitter · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Twitter

4Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Twitter was named 3 times in Whistleblowing and 1 other category, where FaceUp led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market106 of 107
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In whistleblowing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Twitter for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Whistleblowing and investigationsCore HR and payroll0%106 of 107100%2under 10 labels · led by FaceUp at 25%
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience0%78 of 106100%1under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Twitter yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Twitter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00022
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“relying on them as a secure submission channel is dangerous” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Use with Caution ... General Social Media Platforms (Twitter/X, Reddit, Discord, Facebook, Instagram)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Great for engagement but dangerous for confidential communication” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Twitter, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Twitter was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Facebook3 of 40Not among the top eight
X3 of 40Not among the top eight
GlobaLeaks2 of 42Not among the top eight
SecureDrop2 of 42Not among the top eight
LinkedIn2 of 41Not among the top eight
Instagram2 of 40Not among the top eight
Reddit2 of 40Not among the top eight
Blink1 of 41Not among the top eight
Indeed1 of 41Not among the top eight
Apple Mail1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Twitter. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named Twitter and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

slashdot.org2
agilityportal.io1
bitdefender.com1
cdt.org1
claimdepot.com1
classaction.org1
csoonline.com1
en.wikipedia.org1
engage.morphisec.com1
engagesolutionsgroup.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Twitter came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

agilityportal.io/blog/best-frontline-communication-platforms1
agilityportal.io/blog/best-frontline-communication-tools1
bitdefender.com/en-gb/blog/hotforsecurity/parents-need-know-whisper1
cdt.org/insights/the-false-promise-of-anonymity1
claimdepot.com/category/privacy1
classaction.org/news/category/california-invasion-of-privacy-act1
classaction.org/news/category/privacy1
csoonline.com/article/571029/5-riskiest-mobile-apps.html1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on x.com
1,175
subdomains included
Content
222
counted in the table below
Documentation
941
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer65undated
Webinar or virtual event4502008-12-17
News or press3332026-07-24
Report or ebook32undated
Blog2702025-03-08
Case study12undated
Template or tool8undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page x.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Twitter

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Twitter; a claim can dispute any of them.
Twitter/X 3

Follow Twitter

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Twitter is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary.
x.com
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Twitter's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: x.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Twitter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Twitter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Twitter by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Twitter is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Twitter, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at x.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.