AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Together Corporate Mentorship · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Together Corporate Mentorship

7Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Together Corporate Mentorship was named 2 times in Mentoring software, where Together led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Together Corporate Mentorship for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Mentoring softwareLearning and development4%10 of 770%2under 10 labels · led by Together at 28%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Together Corporate Mentorship held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Mentoring software · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 50, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 of 74, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 of 43, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Mentoring software0%4%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.New this editionRank 10 of 77, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Together Corporate Mentorship across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase2 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best mentoring program software for a mid-market B2B company includes MentorCity, Together Corporate Mentorship, Qooper, and Guider.” Llama 4 Maverick · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Together Corporate Mentorship” MiniMax M2.5 · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Together Corporate Mentorship, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Together Corporate Mentorship was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Qooper6 of 71Not among the top eight
Chronus2 of 71Not among the top eight
GrowthMentor2 of 70Not among the top eight
Dreami1 of 70Not among the top eight
F6S1 of 70Not among the top eight
Guideflow1 of 70Not among the top eight
Guider1 of 70Not among the top eight
MentorCity1 of 70Not among the top eight
MentorCloud1 of 70Not among the top eight
MentorcliQ1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Together Corporate Mentorship. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Together Corporate Mentorship and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com7
capterra.com4
growthmentor.com4
guideflow.com4
softwaresuggest.com4
f6s.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
chronus.com2
g2.com2
omr.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Together Corporate Mentorship came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

togetherplatform.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Together Corporate Mentorship takes 4% of first choices and Together takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “mentoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mentoring program software”
3
Organic visits to its site
about 37,952 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,029 · 704 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,929
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
69 ads · 63 text, 4 image, 2 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2025, as Together (US) Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 27 in the year, 42 before. 19 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 77 in mentoring software
Segment leader
28%
Together
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on togetherplatform.com
1,382
subdomains included
Content
961
counted in the table below
Documentation
197
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog650102026-08-10Succession planning, Performance management
Case study140undated
Webinar or virtual event100undated
Glossary or explainer2512026-08-10Mentoring software, Succession planning
Template or tool1432026-09-10
Comparison1312026-08-10Performance management
Conference or event1102023-05-02
Report or ebook6undated
Podcast or video102021-11-07
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page togetherplatform.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Together Corporate Mentorship

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Together Corporate Mentorship is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Together's mentorship software makes it simple to start a mentorship program in your workplace to accelerate employee development.
For
HR and L&D professionals
Free plan or trial
free templates togetherplatform.com/use-cases/diversity
Certifications
SOC 2SAML & SSOSOC 2 certified
Customers named
ActivisionHubspotMarquetaAvison YoungFirst HorizonThe ForumFergusonLouisiana Department of Health
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Together Corporate Mentorship's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: togetherplatform.com, togetherplatform.com/pricing, togetherplatform.com/use-cases/diversity, togetherplatform.com/customers, togetherplatform.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Together Corporate Mentorship's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Together Corporate Mentorship, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Together Corporate Mentorship by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Together Corporate Mentorship is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Together Corporate Mentorship, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at togetherplatform.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.