AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Sterling Administration · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Sterling Administration

10Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sterling Administration was named 3 times in HSA & FSA admin, where HealthEquity led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hsa & fsa admin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sterling Administration for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
HSA and FSA administratorsCompensation and total rewards0%111 of 111100%3under 10 labels · led by HealthEquity at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sterling Administration yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sterling Administration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“BBB: Multiple negative reviews - Common issues: Poor communication, strange/unclear policies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why to Avoid: Serious operational issues regarding the availability of funds.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · hard negative
“BBB and review snippets suggest complaints around releasing FSA money.” GPT-5.4 mini · HSA & FSA admin · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sterling Administration, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sterling Administration was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HealthEquity8 of 100Not among the top eight
Fidelity HSA6 of 103Not among the top eight
Lively4 of 101Not among the top eight
Rocky Mountain Reserve4 of 100Not among the top eight
HSA Bank3 of 100Not among the top eight
TASC3 of 100Not among the top eight
WEX Health3 of 100Not among the top eight
PayFlex2 of 101Not among the top eight
Discovery Benefits2 of 100Not among the top eight
Navia Benefits2 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sterling Administration. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Sterling Administration and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sterlingadministration.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sterling Administration takes 0% of first choices and HealthEquity takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “hsa and fsa administrator”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “hsa and fsa administrators”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“sterling administration”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
7 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,973 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,490 · 26 in the top three
Sites linking to it
572
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 111 of 111 in HSA & FSA admin
Segment leader
29%
HealthEquity
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
10 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sterlingadministration.com
343
subdomains included
Content
47
counted in the table below
Documentation
24
Product · Integration
27 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog3002025-04-03
Webinar or virtual event1112026-10-01
Template or tool402024-08-14
Conference or event102019-03-01
News or press102024-09-02
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sterlingadministration.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Sterling Administration

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sterling Administration is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Sterling ensures regulatory and industry compliance with every product we offer, including HSAs, HRAs, FSAs, POPs, and COBRA.
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Sterling Administration's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sterlingadministration.com, sterlingadministration.com/products/compliance, sterlingadministration.com/platform, sterlingadministration.com/about/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sterling Administration's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sterling Administration, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sterling Administration by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sterling Administration is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sterling Administration, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sterlingadministration.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.