Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 80 → 29 of 124
1 category · Named, not rankedIBM watsonx Orchestrate
6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. IBM watsonx Orchestrate was named 3 times in HR AI assistants, where MeBeBot led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market34 of 142
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 110
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In hr ai assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named IBM watsonx Orchestrate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 34 of 142 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, IBM watsonx Orchestrate held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · HR AI assistants · by segment
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 24 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 34 of 142 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated IBM watsonx Orchestrate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated IBM watsonx Orchestrate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need agent orchestration across departments → Oracle or IBM watsonx” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM watsonx Orchestrate, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM watsonx Orchestrate was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM watsonx Orchestrate, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM watsonx Orchestrate was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM watsonx Orchestrate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named IBM watsonx Orchestrate and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
moveworks.com6
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
humand.co5
kvistly.com5
resources.rework.com4
wonderchat.io4
workhuman.com4
sanalabs.com3
alignify.co2
chatbot.com2
Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming IBM watsonx Orchestrate came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ibm.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, IBM watsonx Orchestrate takes 0% of first choices and MeBeBot takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ibm.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, IBM watsonx Orchestrate takes 0% of first choices and MeBeBot takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “hr ai assistants”
3
Position for “ai assistant for hr teams”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 31,137,701 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 562,131 · 83,264 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 426,759
- Paid Google search
- 21 searches its ads show for, about 177 clicks and $2,518 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 142 in HR AI assistants
Segment leader
21%
MeBeBot
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 6 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ibm.com
12,886
subdomains included
Content
2,707
counted in the table below
Documentation
14
Product · Integration
2,160 · 81
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 1,341 | 3 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| News or press | 882 | 4 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 192 | 3 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 97 | 28 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Blog | 69 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 50 | 9 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | 3 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 14 | 9 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 0 | 2026-02-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ai forecasters new opportunity business hire humans too news or press
- 2026-09-25Eth zurich robot hand walks on fingers news or press
- 2026-09-25New frontier ai models podcast or video
- 2026-09-23From ai pilots autonomous ams blog
- 2026-09-23Shadow ai has reached soc security teams blind spots blog
- 2026-09-23Ai labs ignoring cybersecurity podcast or video
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 9, 2026Mizuho Technology ConferenceNew York · spoke
- March 3, 20262026 Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom ConferenceSan Francisco · spoke
As the event pages on ibm.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ibm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as IBM watsonx Orchestrate
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM watsonx Orchestrate; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle / IBM watsonx Orchestrate 1
Follow IBM watsonx Orchestrate
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
IBM watsonx Orchestrate is its own company.ShowHide
The company
IBM watsonx Orchestrate is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A comprehensive agent management platform to build and manage all your AI agents in one control plane.
- For
- IT, security and AI leaders
- Price stated
- Essentials Starting at $530.00 USD Per month*; Standard Starting at $6,360.00 USD Per month*; Premium Contact us ibm.com/products/watsonx-orchestrate
- Starting price
- 530 ibm.com/products/watsonx-orchestrate
- Free plan or trial
- Try and explore watsonx Orchestrate for a 30-day free period by using the watsonx Orchestrate trial access. ibm.com/products/watsonx-orchestrate
- Customers named
- Riyadh AirUFCRecording Academy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What IBM watsonx Orchestrate's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ibm.com/products/watsonx-orchestrate, developer.ibm.com/components/watsonx-orchestrate, developer.ibm.com/blogs/watsonx-orchestrate-june2025, developer.ibm.com/learningpaths/watsonx-orchestrate-agentops, developer.ibm.com/articles/awb-overview-ibm-watsonx-orchestrate. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM watsonx Orchestrate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM watsonx Orchestrate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM watsonx Orchestrate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where IBM watsonx Orchestrate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM watsonx Orchestrate, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.