HR AI Index

Index › Products › ForUsAll · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ForUsAll

13Judge labels

1First choices

5Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ForUsAll was named 3 times in 401(k) providers, where Human Interest led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 61

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprise74 of 74

under the label threshold

In 401(k) providers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ForUsAll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
401(k) providers	Compensation and total rewards	0%	18 of 78	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Human Interest at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ForUsAll yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ForUsAll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Human Interest/ForUsAll for tech-forward” Grok 4.1 Fast · 401(k) providers · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ForUsAll, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ForUsAll was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanguard10 of 131Not among the top eight

Guideline9 of 133Not among the top eight

ADP Retirement Services8 of 131Not among the top eight

Fidelity Advantage 4018 of 130Not among the top eight

Human Interest7 of 133Not among the top eight

Paychex5 of 130Not among the top eight

Ubiquity4 of 131Not among the top eight

Charles Schwab4 of 130Not among the top eight

T. Rowe Price2 of 131Not among the top eight

Betterment at Work2 of 130Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ForUsAll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named ForUsAll and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com8

adp.com7

forbes.com7

bbb.org6

fidelity.com6

uschamber.com6

fitsmallbusiness.com5

forusall.comYour site5

myubiquity.com5

spotsaas.com5

Fifty-five of the sixty domain citations in answers naming ForUsAll came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fidelity.com/retirement-ira/small-business/compare-retirement-plans6

forbes.com/advisor/retirement/best-401k-plans6

g2.com/products/forusall/reviews6

uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/employee-retirement-providers6

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-401k-companies5

adp.com/what-we-offer/benefits/retirement/401k.aspx4

betterment.com/top-401k-providers-for-small-business-setup-in-20264

duncanins.com/best-401-k-plan-for-small-business4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

forusall.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ForUsAll takes 0% of first choices and Human Interest takes 20%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “401(k) provider”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “401(k) providers”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“forusall”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 7 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 17,386 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,647 · 183 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,545
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

6 ads · 5 text, 1 image · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2022, as ForUsAll Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 18 of 78 in 401(k) providers

Segment leader

20%

Human Interest

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on forusall.com

396

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Comparison	10	0	2026-03-13
Template or tool	10	0	2026-02-02
Glossary or explainer	3	0	2026-01-23
Blog	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	0	2024-02-24
Podcast or video	1	0	2026-01-23

Most recent

2026-03-13Safe harbor 401k cheaper alternative comparison
2026-02-02Safe harbor 401k calculator template or tool
2026-01-30Employer match calculator template or tool
2026-01-30Plan cost calculator template or tool
2026-01-30Retirement savings calculator template or tool
2026-01-30Safe harbor calculator template or tool

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page forusall.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ForUsAll

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ForUsAll is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Built for startups and small businesses, ForUsAll is a modern 401(k) provider that provides access to crypto, financial wellness, low fees and more.
forusall.com
For: startups and small businesses
forusall.com
Price stated: Affordable pricing for everyone forusall.com
Starting price: $50/mo forusall.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 200 forusall.com
Certifications: SOC 2SOC 3PCI
Customers named: LeverBeechmont RacquetWestwave CapitalDas TalentLafayette Physical Therapy
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, hosting

What ForUsAll's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: forusall.com, forusall.com/pricing, forusall.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ForUsAll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ForUsAll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ForUsAll by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ForUsAll is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ForUsAll, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.