HR AI Index

Index › Products › Elevate · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Elevate

9Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Elevate was named 3 times in HSA & FSA admin, where HealthEquity led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 111

under the label threshold

Enterprise24 of 78

under the label threshold

In hsa & fsa admin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Elevate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
HSA and FSA administrators	Compensation and total rewards	0%	26 of 111	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by HealthEquity at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Elevate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Elevate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Elevate is an increasingly compelling choice that's gaining significant traction in the market.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HSA & FSA admin · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“with Elevate as a strong alternative depending on your specific needs” Kimi K2 · HSA & FSA admin · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Elevate, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elevate was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Alegeus5 of 92Not among the top eight

HealthEquity5 of 92Not among the top eight

WEX Health4 of 91Not among the top eight

Businessolver3 of 91Not among the top eight

Gusto3 of 90Not among the top eight

WEX Benefits2 of 92Not among the top eight

Navia Benefit Solutions2 of 91Not among the top eight

Benefitfocus2 of 90Not among the top eight

Empower2 of 90Not among the top eight

Fidelity HSA2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Elevate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Elevate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elevate.aiYour site6

umbrex.com6

wifitalents.com6

zendikt.com5

guideflow.com4

hibob.com4

hrtechsaas.com4

recruiterslineup.com4

appsruntheworld.com3

g2.com3

Thirty-nine of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Elevate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

umbrex.com/resources/company-profiles/wex6

zendikt.com/top-10-benefits-administration-software/united-states5

hibob.com/blog/best-benefits-administration-software4

zendikt.com/top-10-benefits-administration-software4

elevate.ai/press-releases/gusto-partners-with-elevate-to-enhance-consumer-benefit-account-3

guideflow.com/blog/hsa-software3

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-fsa-hsa-administrators-mid-market-employers3

recruiterslineup.com/top-fsa-providers3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

elevate.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Elevate takes 0% of first choices and HealthEquity takes 29%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “hsa and fsa administrator”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “hsa and fsa administrators”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“elevate”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 213,603 a month

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 26 of 111 in HSA & FSA admin

Segment leader

29%

HealthEquity

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 9 answers
Its own site cited: in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on elevate.ai

141

subdomains included

Content

112

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

5 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	56	4	2026-09-23
News or press	35	4	2026-09-29	Benefits administration
Podcast or video	12	undated
Case study	4	0	2025-11-13
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Conference or event	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated
Comparison	1	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Elevate drivewealth and intellicents partner to deliver embeddable api driven tax advantaged benefits news or press
2026-09-23Rocky mountain reserve post implementation blog
2026-09-09Proficient benefit solutions news or press
2026-08-20Cut time cost and errors with elevates smart plan design technology blog
2026-08-20Elevate cuts your client setup time by 17 weeks blog
2026-08-12Elevate 2026 inc 5000 news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page elevate.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Elevate

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Elevate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Elevate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Elevate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Elevate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Elevate, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.