Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 75 → 67 of 100
1 category · Named, not rankedDraup
17Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Draup was named 7 times in Talent intelligence, where Pin led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business71 of 104
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market19 of 90
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 68
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In talent intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Draup for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 19 of 90 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Draup held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Talent intelligence · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 → 16 of 80
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 49 → 16 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 19 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Draup across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Draup across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Often used for workforce planning, location strategy, and skills demand analysis” Perplexity Sonar · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“Visier, Draup – Workforce intelligence and planning.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“Labor market supply/demand intelligence (Draup)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Labor Market & Location Intelligence” Kimi K2 · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Draup, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Draup was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Draup, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Draup was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Draup. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Draup and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
xobin.com14
pin.com12
jobspipe.dev11
skima.ai11
guideflow.com9
g2.com8
hrtechsaas.com8
learn.g2.com8
hiretruffle.com7
bestrecruitingtools.com6
Ninety-four of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming Draup came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
draup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Draup takes 0% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
draup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Draup takes 0% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “talent intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“draup”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 412 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 311 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 794
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 90 in talent intelligence
Segment leader
27%
Pin
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on draup.com
1,142
subdomains included
Content
569
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
29 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 293 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | Workforce planning, Talent intelligence | |
| Glossary or explainer | 138 | 39 | 2026-07-09 | Workforce planning, Talent intelligence | |
| Case study | 68 | 0 | 2024-01-01 | Workforce planning, Talent intelligence | |
| Report or ebook | 46 | 0 | 2025-04-09 | Talent intelligence, Workforce planning | |
| Podcast or video | 17 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | Workforce planning, People analytics | |
| Comparison | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | Talent intelligence, Workforce planning | |
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17The execution premium blog
- 2026-08-18Hr talent insights from our nyc conference conference or event
- 2026-07-10Ai agent for account momentum analysis blog
- 2026-07-10Ai agent for persona analysis blog
- 2026-07-10Ai competitor analysis agent blog
- 2026-07-10Ai peer intelligence agent blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page draup.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name workforce planning (38); 24 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Draup
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Draup is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Draup is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI workforce transformation & AI sales agents
- For
- enterprise teams: CHROs and HR leaders planning AI-era workforce transformation, talent acquisition and workforce planning teams making hiring and location decisions, and revenue teams across sales, marketing, partnerships, corporate strategy, and customer success
- Free plan or trial
- Free AI Workforce Diagnostic draup.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 draup.com/sales/solutions/sales · 30 draup.com/etter/integrations pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRISO 27001EAIGG
- Customers named
- MicrosoftKPIT
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What Draup's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: draup.com, trust.draup.com, draup.com/sales/solutions/sales, draup.com/sales/case-studies, draup.com/etter/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Draup's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Draup, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Draup by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Draup is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Draup, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.