Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 14 of 60
1 category · Named, not rankedCodeSignal Build
3Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CodeSignal Build was named 1 time in Technical hiring assessm, where HackerRank led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 61
3%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market30 of 71
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CodeSignal Build for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 30 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CodeSignal Build held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 27 of 67
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 30 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CodeSignal Build across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CodeSignal Build across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best low-cost polished platform for small teams: CodeSignal Build” GPT-5.4 mini · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CodeSignal Build, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeSignal Build was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CodeSignal Build, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeSignal Build was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CodeSignal Build. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named CodeSignal Build and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
codesignal.comYour site3
codility.com2
testgorilla.com2
aurorasolutions.coderbyte.com1
coderbyte.com1
coderpad.io1
hackerrank.com1
Eight of the eleven domain citations in answers naming CodeSignal Build came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
codesignal.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CodeSignal Build takes 0% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
codesignal.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CodeSignal Build takes 0% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coding assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “technical assessment platforms”
9
- Organic visits to its site
- about 152,420 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 46,425 · 760 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,724
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 100 clicks and $5,323 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 30 of 71 in technical hiring assessm
Segment leader
17%
HackerRank
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on codesignal.com
12,657
subdomains included
Content
12,495
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 11,915 | undated | Technical hiring assessm, Performance management | ||
| Blog | 422 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | Candidate assessment, Video interviewing | |
| News or press | 50 | 3 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Comparison | 37 | 4 | 2026-08-26 | Candidate assessment | |
| Case study | 31 | 0 | 2026-05-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 1 | 2026-09-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | 0 | 2025-03-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2025-07-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-19Hiring you can stand behind webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-15Ai job simulation tools blog
- 2026-09-14Best ai assessment platforms blog
- 2026-09-097 best skills based hiring platforms in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-09Codesignal and harvard business impact bring hands on ai and essential skills development to universities worldwide news or press
- 2026-08-26Modern hire alternatives comparison
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 24, 2026 to March 25, 2026Transform 2026Wynn Las Vegas
As the event pages on codesignal.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page codesignal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow CodeSignal Build
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CodeSignal Build is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CodeSignal Build is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- For small teams making their first technical hires.
- For
- small teams making their first technical hires
- Price stated
- $79 /mo billed annually; $99 /mo billed monthly codesignal.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $79 /mo codesignal.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPAData Privacy FrameworkTX-RAMPEEOC & OFCCP compliance
- Hosting
- US
- Customers named
- GreenhouseAsanaBrexDropboxUnitedHealth GroupInstacartNortheastern UniversityNextdoor
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations
What CodeSignal Build's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: codesignal.com, codesignal.com/pricing, trust.codesignal.com, codesignal.com/platform, codesignal.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CodeSignal Build's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CodeSignal Build, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CodeSignal Build by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CodeSignal Build is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CodeSignal Build, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.