AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › AirMason · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

AirMason

19Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AirMason was named 5 times in HR compliance, where Rippling led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hr compliance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AirMason for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll0%23 of 970%5under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19%▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, AirMason held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · HR compliance · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 13 of 66
Mid-market▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 4 → 20 of 91
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 6 of 72

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
HR compliance8%0%▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 → 23 of 97

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated AirMason across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase18 labels4
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose [AirMason] if you want a highly designed, branded, and interactive web experience” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“AirMason or Guideflow: For design-heavy/custom handbooks with interactive elements” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if You Want Design-Focused & Polished: AirMason” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Airmason (Best for Modern UX & Compliance)” MiniMax M2.5 · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AirMason, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AirMason was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Blissbook11 of 193Not among the top eight
Trainual10 of 195Not among the top eight
Gusto5 of 191Not among the top eight
SixFifty4 of 191Not among the top eight
BambooHR4 of 190Not among the top eight
Handbooks.io3 of 192Not among the top eight
Rippling3 of 191Not among the top eight
NAVEX PolicyTech3 of 190Not among the top eight
Workday3 of 190Not among the top eight
SixFifty Employee Handbook Creator2 of 191Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AirMason. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named AirMason and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airmason.comYour site18
blissbook.com13
guideflow.com12
peoplemanagingpeople.com11
worldmetrics.org11
trainual.com10
f6s.com8
guidde.com8
gitnux.org7
hrdocket.com7

Eighty-seven of the 105 domain citations in answers naming AirMason came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

airmason.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AirMason takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “hr compliance tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “hr compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“airmason”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,112 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,417 · 62 in the top three
Sites linking to it
811
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
17 ads · 17 text · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2022, as AirMason Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 16 in the year, 1 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 97 in HR compliance
Segment leader
19%
Rippling
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
19 answers
Its own site cited
in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on airmason.com
456
subdomains included
Content
164
counted in the table below
Documentation
183
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog12012026-07-13HR compliance, HRIS and HCM platforms
Comparison3102026-05-20
Template or tool762026-09-23
Case study4undated
Glossary or explainer212026-09-23
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page airmason.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as AirMason

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AirMason; a claim can dispute any of them.
Airmason 1

Follow AirMason

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AirMason is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Employee Handbook Builder & Software
For
HR teams and business leaders
Price stated
Plans begin at Startup level (up to 99 employees), costing $999 USD annually. airmason.com
Starting price
999 airmason.com
Free plan or trial
Free Trial airmason.com
Certifications
SHRM-certified HR professionalsGDPRCCPAADAWCAGSection 508HIPAASOC2
Customers named
MT+CoJackson LabsKrazy Coupon LadyIAT InsuranceTopHatFounder ShieldBNA CPA & Advisors
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What AirMason's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: airmason.com, airmason.com/plans, airmason.com/blog/tag/compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AirMason's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AirMason, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AirMason by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AirMason is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AirMason, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at airmason.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.