Seven of fourteen models named Human Interest first on the direct prompt; four named Fidelity Investments. Human Interest was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Fidelity Investments by nine and Human Interest carries 42 labels and Fidelity Investments 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 401(k) providers page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Human Interest and Fidelity Investments were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 105 answers naming Human Interest and the 54 naming Fidelity Investments. In those answers Fidelity Investments took the first choice ten times and Human Interest seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“slam poor support, payroll delays/errors, and communication issues” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Human Interest, Slavic401k, Guideline, and Ubiquity/Online 401(k) in various user reviews or forum posts reporting high costs, poor service” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“notable player, but it has historically been more focused on smaller businesses than true mid-market complexity” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Best Tech-Forward & Automated: Human Interest ... If you use Rippling, Gusto, or BambooHR and want the lowest administrative burden: Go with Human Interest.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Human Interest is recommended as the best fit for mid-market employers that want managed 401k administration with structured onboarding and conversion support.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Human Interest: Best Overall Value & Ease of Use ... go with Human Interest or Guideline” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Fidelity Investments agreed to a multi-million dollar settlement after allegations that it charged excessive fees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fidelity is widely considered the leader in the 401(k) space due to its aggressive price cuts and massive selection of funds.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Principal or Fidelity if you want comprehensive features, broad investment options, and strong institutional support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Vanguard, Fidelity Investments, and Charles Schwab are renowned for offering excellent low-cost institutional index funds.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.