ChartHop vs Organimi
Five of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; one named Organimi. Both were named by all fourteen models and ChartHop carries 48 labels and Organimi 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrganimi
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, ChartHop and Organimi were named in the same answer sixty-five times, of the 382 answers naming ChartHop and the 112 naming Organimi. In those answers Organimi took the first choice fifteen times and ChartHop eleven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
ChartHop Organimi first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Organimi on the right.The direct prompt
ChartHop first, Organimi an alternative
5 of 14 modelsOrganimi was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Organimi first, ChartHop an alternative
1 of 14 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Organimi32%#1 of 15ChartHop4%#6 of 15ChartHop30%#1 of 13Organimi9%#2 of 13ChartHop20%#2 of 15Organimi2%#9 of 15What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“consider HR-based tools like ChartHop, Orgvue, or Nakisa, which connect to live data sources and regenerate the chart automatically” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Organimi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Tools reliant on infrequent data syncs (e.g., import-only like some tiers of Organimi or Monday.com)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi has data integration issues and is not as scalable as other options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi at ~$20/mo for up to 150 employees is frequently cited as the affordable dedicated option” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Organimi Premium for a typical mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Organimi is notable for being completely free for up to 25 users” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.