Five of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; one named OrgChart. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and OrgChart by eleven and ChartHop carries 48 labels and OrgChart 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, ChartHop and OrgChart were named in the same answer sixty-two times, of the 382 answers naming ChartHop and the 87 naming OrgChart. In those answers OrgChart took the first choice eight times and ChartHop fourteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“consider HR-based tools like ChartHop, Orgvue, or Nakisa, which connect to live data sources and regenerate the chart automatically” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Reviews mention steep learning curves, complexity, or clunky directory experiences in certain products. ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/orgchart/reviews” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve — users report feeling "overwhelmed by inconsistent training and complex features"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Interface is dated and not intuitive for average users ... Clunky administration for making changes” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend OrgChart if your main need is a practical, easy-to-adopt organizational design and org-chart tool” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“described as a leading org chart automation and workforce planning solution built for HR professionals” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Org Chart Software (like Lucidchart, OrgChart, or Miro) - Best for visualizing hierarchy” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.