| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 135 of 136 | 100% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Often compared to Robert Half in terms of complaints. Recent feedback suggests issues with job matching accuracy and communication.” MiniMax M2.5 · Staffing agency tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently criticized on Reddit, Trustpilot, and employee review sites for: - Ghosting candidates after offering positions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Staffing agency tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“Similar reputation to Robert Half; numerous complaints” Kimi K2 · Staffing agency tools · negative prompt · hard negative
“TekSystems / Aerotek / Actalent: Frequently criticized for placing candidates into roles with lower pay than promised” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Staffing agency tools · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Teksystems and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Teksystems came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 917 | undated | |||
| News or press | 326 | undated | Workforce planning | ||
| Case study | 306 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 20 | 0 | 2023-11-22 | ||
| Podcast or video | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2023-11-22 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2025-12-01 |
Every page teksystems.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Teksystems's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: teksystems.com, teksystems.com/en/who-we-are/partnerships/aws/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teksystems's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teksystems, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teksystems by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: