AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Levels.fyi · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Levels.fyi

20Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Levels.fyi was named 5 times in Compensation benchmarkin and 1 other category, where Pave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Levels.fyi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compensation benchmarking dataCompensation and total rewards0%100 of 14833%3under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Compensation managementCompensation and total rewards0%111 of 14050%2under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, Levels.fyi held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compensation benchmarkin · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 30 of 143
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 133 → 91 of 138
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 113 → 101 of 115

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compensation benchmarkin0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 133 → 100 of 148
Compensation management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 148 → 111 of 140

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Levels.fyi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“use Levels.fyi/Glassdoor for tech total-comp transparency” Muse Glimmer 30B · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Levels.fyi (free) for equity” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compensation benchmarkin · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“rely on individuals voluntarily submitting their own salary information” Muse Glimmer 30B · Compensation management · negative prompt · hard negative
“High margin of error, self-reporting bias... Avoid relying solely on crowdsourced data for setting official company bands.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation benchmarkin · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Levels.fyi, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Levels.fyi was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pave17 of 209Not among the top eight
Payscale16 of 201Not among the top eight
Ravio12 of 201Not among the top eight
Comprehensive.io10 of 203Not among the top eight
Mercer Total Remuneration Survey9 of 201Not among the top eight
Salary.com CompAnalyst9 of 201Not among the top eight
Glassdoor9 of 200Not among the top eight
Radford7 of 201Not among the top eight
Figures6 of 200Not among the top eight
Indeed5 of 200Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Levels.fyi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named Levels.fyi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ravio.com16
pin.com13
comprehensive.io11
pave.com10
captivateiq.com7
firsthr.app7
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
deel.com5
fitsmallbusiness.com5
figures.hr4

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Levels.fyi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

levels.fyi is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Levels.fyi takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “benchmarking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “salary benchmarking data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
74,000 a month (“levels.fyi”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
7 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,116,986 a month
Searches its site ranks for
89,070 · 17,772 in the top three
Sites linking to it
10,757
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 100 of 148 in compensation benchmarkin
Segment leader
19%
Pave
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on levels.fyi
10,000
subdomains included
Content
278
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
2 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook204undated
Blog66undated
Glossary or explainer3undated
News or press2undated
Conference or event1undated
Comparison1undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page levels.fyi exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Levels.fyi

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Levels.fyi is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Salaries & Tools to Level Up Your Career
For
job seekers, employers, and academic research users
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Levels.fyi's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: levels.fyi, levels.fyi/internships/Bandwidth/Platform-Engineer-Intern. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Levels.fyi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Levels.fyi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Levels.fyi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Levels.fyi is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Levels.fyi, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at levels.fyi is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.