Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedKPMG
11Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. KPMG was named 4 times in Compensation benchmarkin, where Pave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market32 of 148
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 130
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named KPMG for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 32 of 148 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, KPMG held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation benchmarkin · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 28 of 138
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 22 → 19 of 115
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 32 of 148 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated KPMG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated KPMG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Need auditable, compliance-grade benchmarking? → Deloitte or KPMG” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation benchmarkin · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as KPMG, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KPMG was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as KPMG, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KPMG was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KPMG. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named KPMG and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gitnux.org10
worldmetrics.org10
wifitalents.com9
zipdo.co8
linkedin.com6
thehackettgroup.com3
24marketreports.com2
aiopsschool.com2
computerworld.com2
marketintelo.com2
Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming KPMG came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
kpmg.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, KPMG takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
kpmg.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, KPMG takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “benchmarking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “salary benchmarking data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“kpmg”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9,067 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 323,375 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 40,482 · 3,953 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 100,110
- Paid Google search
- 19 searches its ads show for, about 218 clicks and $8,582 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 148 in compensation benchmarkin
Segment leader
19%
Pave
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on kpmg.com
10,008
subdomains included
Content
3,600
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
29 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,801 | 159 | 2026-10-01 | ||
| News or press | 495 | 37 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Conference or event | 164 | 47 | 2026-11-01 | ||
| Case study | 90 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 23 | 16 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | 5 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 2 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 1 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-01Finance consolidation transformation journey conference or event
- 2026-11-01Insurance soiree conference or event
- 2026-11-01Regional market focus conference or event
- 2026-10-01Digital treasury summit conference or event
- 2026-10-01India mobile congress 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-01Agrasar bharat manch blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 9, 2026FastighetsseminariumVasagatan 16, Stockholm, Sweden · hosts
- October 16, 2026FastighetsseminariumMårten Krakowgatan 2, våning 12, Arena Platinan, Göteborg, Sweden · hosts
- October 21, 2026Stora SkattedagenAt Six, Brunkebergstorg 6, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden · hosts
- October 22, 2026FastighetsseminariumNordenskiöldsgatan 8, Malmö, Sweden · hosts
Last twelve months
- September 18, 2026Kurser i finansiella instrumentKPMG:s kontor, Vasagatan 16, Stockholm, Stockholm · hosted
- September 17, 2026Kurser i finansiella instrumentKPMG:s kontor, Vasagatan 16, Stockholm, Stockholm · hosted
- August 26, 2026VAT in the Digital Age: Insights on ViDA with the Swedish Tax AgencyKPMG Office, Vasagatan 16, Stockholm, Stockholm · hosted
As the event pages on kpmg.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page kpmg.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow KPMG
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
KPMG is its own company.ShowHide
The company
KPMG is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Welcome to KPMG International.
- For
- clients
- Customers named
- Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthDLA PiperSailGPPhilips
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What KPMG's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: kpmg.com, kpmg.com/uk/en/services/deal-advisory/integration-separation/pricing-strategy.html, kpmg.com/uk/en/services/tax/business/compliance/tax-connect.html, kpmg.com/us/en/capabilities-services.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KPMG's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KPMG, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for KPMG by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where KPMG is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name KPMG, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.