AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › EY · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

EY

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EY was named 1 time in Compensation benchmarkin, where Pave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EY for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compensation benchmarking dataCompensation and total rewards0%94 of 1480%1under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, EY held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compensation benchmarkin · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 106 of 143, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 29 → 83 of 138
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 31 → 29 of 115

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compensation benchmarkin0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 29 → 94 of 148

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated EY across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EY, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EY was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deloitte5 of 51Not among the top eight
APQC3 of 50Not among the top eight
Bain & Company3 of 50Not among the top eight
Gartner3 of 50Not among the top eight
McKinsey & Company3 of 50Not among the top eight
PwC3 of 50Not among the top eight
Mercer Total Remuneration Survey2 of 51Not among the top eight
Payscale2 of 51Not among the top eight
The Hackett Group2 of 51Not among the top eight
BCG2 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EY. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named EY and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org5
worldmetrics.org5
zipdo.co5
wifitalents.com4
ravio.com2
revenuebase.ai2
thehackettgroup.com2
apqc.org1
arena.ai1
brandwatch.com1

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming EY came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ey.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EY takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “benchmarking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “salary benchmarking data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“ey”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,353,547 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 572,375 a month
Searches its site ranks for
44,120 · 5,543 in the top three
Sites linking to it
118,107
Paid Google search
9 searches its ads show for, about 82 clicks and $2,075 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
56+ ads · 56 text · 56 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as WPP Placeholder, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 32 in the year, 24 before. 64 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 94 of 148 in compensation benchmarkin
Segment leader
19%
Pave
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ey.com
10,055
subdomains included
Content
25
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press13112026-09-01
Blog942026-09-11
Glossary or explainer3undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ey.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as EY

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EY; a claim can dispute any of them.
PwC / EY 1

Follow EY

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

EY is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
EY provides consulting, assurance, tax and transaction services that help solve our client’s toughest challenges and build a better working world for all.
For
clients
Customers named
Microsoft 365MedtronicCenterPoint EnergyXcel EnergyBristol Myers SquibbSt James’s HospitalCity of AntwerpLion
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What EY's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ey.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EY's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EY, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EY by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where EY is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name EY, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ey.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.