Eight of fourteen models named Compt first on the direct prompt; four named Forma. Both were named by all fourteen models and Compt carries 41 labels and Forma 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Compt and Forma were named in the same answer ninety-four times, of the 129 answers naming Compt and the 184 naming Forma. In those answers Forma took the first choice twenty-four times and Compt thirty-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“it's more of a premium-feeling platform than the cheapest route” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Compt if you want to offer flexible lifestyle stipends, want to keep unspent budget in the company's pocket, and need robust tax automation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Compt | Payroll-integrated, tax-compliant reimbursement at mid/large companies | Strong reporting, guardrails, payroll integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Compt’s flat annual software fee + pay-only-on-claims model … is the most budget-predictable reimbursement-first option” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Forma has user reviews reporting limited information and reimbursement delays, with regular support gaps rounding out top complaints” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“3. Forma ... Users describe it as one of the "worst experiences" to use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Caution: Higher implementation fees (~$10,000+) and generally higher pricing... May be overkill for leaner mid-sized teams.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Differentiator: It's the most comprehensive "one-stop-shop" — handling both pre-tax and post-tax benefits with the broadest global footprint.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Some platforms, like Forma, offer a streamlined approach to managing pre-tax and post-tax benefits under a single, intuitive platform” Llama 4 Maverick · comparative prompt · first choice
“Forma helps companies manage flexible benefits at scale by consolidating employee perks and benefits into a single platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.