Employee giving and volunteering · October 2026 Edition
Selflessly vs Bright Funds
One of fourteen models named Selflessly first on the direct prompt; five named Bright Funds. Selflessly was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Bright Funds by ten and Selflessly carries 30 labels and Bright Funds 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Bright Funds
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share20%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3016A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Selflessly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Uncommon Giving was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Millie vs Selflessly · Millie vs Bright Funds · Selflessly vs Uncommon Giving
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SelflesslyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBright FundsDirect15
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained701 against Selflessly
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against Bright Funds
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Selflessly and Bright Funds stood in it.
| Model | DirectBF | ParaphraseBF | ComparativeBF | Budget-constrainedBF | Scale-constrainedBF | NegativeBF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | BF | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | BF | | BF | BF | BF | BF |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | BF | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | BF | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | BF | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | BF | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | BF | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | BF | BF | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | BF | |
SelflesslyBF Bright Funds first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Selflessly on the left and Bright Funds on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Selflessly and Bright Funds stood in it.
Selflessly first, Bright Funds not the choice
1 of 14 modelsBright Funds was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-6 LunaSelflessly alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Millie, YourCause
Bright Funds first, Selflessly not the choice
5 of 14 modelsSelflessly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving, VolunteerLocal
Llama 4 MaverickBright Funds alternatives: Guideflow, Uncommon Giving
GLM 4.7 FlashXBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving
MiniMax M2.5Bright Funds, Uncommon Giving alternatives: Millie, OnHand
Muse Glimmer 30BBright Funds, Uncommon Giving
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Uncommon Giving alternatives: Bright Funds, Groundswell, Millie
Gemini 3.5 FlashGroundswell alternatives: Bright Funds, Deed, Millie, Uncommon Giving
Grok 4.1 FastMillie alternatives: Goodera, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
DeepSeek V4 FlashGroundswell, Millie alternatives: Bright Funds, OnHand, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniBonterra alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Perplexity SonarMillie alternatives: Percent Pledge, Uncommon Giving
Qwen 3.7 FlashBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Social Cues alternatives: Goodchange, Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud
Kimi K2Groundswell, Millie alternatives: Alaya, OnHand, YourCause
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Selflessly leads by forty-one points.
Selflessly43%#1 of 11Bright Funds2%#– of 11
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Selflessly leads by twelve points.
Selflessly20%#2 of 10Bright Funds8%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Selflessly leads by two points.
Selflessly2%#– of 11Bright Funds0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about Selflessly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“add giving but exceed tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Selflessly is probably your sweet spot — it's the most affordable all-in-one solution built specifically for small and medium businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in the results is Selflessly because it is explicitly described as an affordable solution” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Tilt (formerly Tilt Studio) or Selflessly, depending on your specific focus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Bright Funds
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Nonprofit Confusion & Onboarding Friction... Basic and Slow UI” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Bright Funds stands out as the top choice due to its focus on impact, ease of use, and alignment with corporate social responsibility goals” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“The best employee giving and volunteering platform for a mid-market B2B company is Bright Funds” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Bright Funds or Uncommon Giving” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Millie vs SelflesslyMillie vs Bright FundsSelflessly vs Uncommon GivingSelflessly vs GroundswellSelflessly vs YourCauseSelflessly vs Benevity Enterprise Impact PlatformSelflessly vs DeedUncommon Giving vs Bright FundsBright Funds vs GroundswellBright Funds vs YourCauseBright Funds vs Benevity Enterprise Impact PlatformBright Funds vs DeedAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full giving & volunteering standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.