Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 84 → 109 of 138
1 category · Named, not rankedWorldatWork
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WorldatWork was named 1 time in Compensation benchmarkin, where Pave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market120 of 148
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 130
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WorldatWork for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 120 of 148 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WorldatWork held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation benchmarkin · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 40 of 115, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 84 → 120 of 148 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WorldatWork across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WorldatWork across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorldatWork, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorldatWork was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorldatWork, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorldatWork was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorldatWork. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named WorldatWork and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ravio.com3
salarycube.com3
workleap.com3
comprehensive.io2
compup.io2
figures.hr2
gitnux.org2
hr-guide.com2
kornferry.com2
mercer.com2
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming WorldatWork came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
worldatwork.org ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WorldatWork takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
worldatwork.org ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WorldatWork takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “benchmarking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “salary benchmarking data provider”
–
not in the top ten
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 120 of 148 in compensation benchmarkin
Segment leader
19%
Pave
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on worldatwork.org
2,669
subdomains included
Content
589
counted in the table below
Documentation
12
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 304 | undated | Performance management, Compensation management | ||
| Template or tool | 79 | undated | Pay equity, Performance management | ||
| Report or ebook | 58 | undated | Performance management, Pay equity | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 53 | 26 | 2026-12-03 | Pay equity, Performance management | |
| News or press | 50 | undated | Pay equity, Performance management | ||
| Conference or event | 21 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 19 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-12-03From employees to owners building the mindsets that drive performance and engagement webinar or virtual event
- 2026-11-17Finding ai use cases in your hr total rewards role webinar or virtual event
- 2026-11-10The value of culture measuring impact and roi webinar or virtual event
- 2026-11-05From metrics to action a practical guide to compensation dashboards webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-294 ways to make total rewards more visible valuable and used webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-27The ai pay paradox smarter decisions better outcomes webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page worldatwork.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name pay equity (10); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow WorldatWork
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WorldatWork is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WorldatWork is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- dedicated to elevating employee experiences and driving organizational performance through rewards, offering education, leadership and community
- For
- HR professionals worldwide
- Certifications
- Certified Compensation Professional (CCP)Global Remuneration Professional (GRP)Certified Sales Compensation Professional (CSCP)Certified Executive Compensation Professionals (CECP)Certified Benefits Professional (CBP)Certified Senior Rewards Professional (CSRP)
- Customers named
- Raiffeisen-Landesbank Steiermark AGO.C. Tanner InstituteCMP Consulting, LLC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What WorldatWork's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: worldatwork.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorldatWork's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorldatWork, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorldatWork by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WorldatWork is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorldatWork, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.