AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › LivePlan · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

LivePlan

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LivePlan was named 2 times in Compensation benchmarkin and 1 other category, where Pave led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compensation benchmarkin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LivePlan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compensation benchmarking dataCompensation and total rewards0%102 of 1480%1under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%71 of 980%1under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, LivePlan held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compensation benchmarkin · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 → 31 of 143
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 93 of 138, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compensation benchmarkin0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 102 of 148, unchanged
Workforce planning0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 71 of 98, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated LivePlan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LivePlan, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LivePlan was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PlanGuru3 of 52Not among the top eight
Jirav3 of 50Not among the top eight
Crayon2 of 50Not among the top eight
G22 of 50Not among the top eight
PassMark PerformanceTest2 of 50Not among the top eight
Databox1 of 51Not among the top eight
3DMark1 of 50Not among the top eight
451 Research1 of 50Not among the top eight
APQC1 of 50Not among the top eight
Accenture1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LivePlan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named LivePlan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org4
zipdo.co4
revenuebase.ai2
wifitalents.com2
aiforbusinesses.com1
apqc.org1
betterworks.com1
business.com1
efama.org1
f6s.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming LivePlan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

liveplan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LivePlan takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “benchmarking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “salary benchmarking data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“liveplan”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
95 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 216,928 a month
Searches its site ranks for
23,866 · 2,578 in the top three
Sites linking to it
9,937
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 81 text, 26 image, 13 video · 32 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as Palo Alto Software Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 101 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 102 of 148 in compensation benchmarkin
Segment leader
19%
Pave
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on liveplan.com
1,695
subdomains included
Content
806
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
20 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog654482026-09-28Payroll software
Webinar or virtual event4002025-04-23
Case study37undated
Comparison2652026-08-11
Template or tool1212026-07-29
Podcast or video1102026-03-03
Conference or event1002026-05-13
Report or ebook802026-05-14
Glossary or explainer642026-09-11
News or press202026-05-13
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page liveplan.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow LivePlan

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LivePlan is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Business Plan Software With Performance Tracking
For
entrepreneurs and small businesses
Price stated
Start planning for $20 /mo liveplan.com
Starting price
20 liveplan.com
Integrations claimed
2 liveplan.com
Certifications
SOC 2SAQ A 3.2Level 1 PCI DSSVisa Cardholder Information Security and Compliance (CISP)MasterCard® Site Data Protection Program (SDP)Discovery Information Security and Compliance (DISC)
Customers named
JoannaBrianMauricioAmy WellsBrandonBenLarry and StacieBruce
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, hosting

What LivePlan's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: liveplan.com, liveplan.com/pricing, liveplan.com/policies/security, liveplan.com/features/perks, liveplan.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LivePlan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LivePlan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LivePlan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LivePlan is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LivePlan, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at liveplan.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.